LPAMin12-09-81LAND PL ANNtNG AC,ENCV
I.ON GW DOD, FLORIDA
TFe Land Planning Agency Aeld its regular meeting on December 9, 1981 in the Longwood
City Comm scion Chambers.
Present:
Emery Me tneke, Vice Lhai rman
Rosemary Kircher
Harvey Smeril son
R. R. Bryant, Building Official
Geri Zambri, Secretary
Absent:
H. N. Haynie, Chairman
Robert Hammond
1. Mr. Mei neke called Che meeting to order in the absence of Chairman H. H. Haynie.
2. Approval of Minutes of November 25, 1961 meeting. Motion by Mr. Smeril son, s cond
by Mrs. Kircher to approve the Minutes of November 25, 1981 meeti nq. Motion carried
unan~mou sly.
3. SITE PLAN - BAYWODO CENTER - Lots 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, Baywootl [ndu strial Park,
Zoned C-3, 8.0. Simpson, A9en t, present to represent Mr. John Schneema n, Owner.
Mr. Bryant presented site plan: properly zoned, not flood prone, Fire Department
mends bons and Mr. Land's letter of approval of site, a ow presented, a
a tta hed to plan. Mrs. Kircher questioned marginal water fl own as stated in Fire
Department's letter. Mr. Bryant said the water flow is better than before and in the
r future. it will improve mo Mr. Me ine ke questioned if there were fire walls.
Mra Simpson said there were fou reor five 4-hour fire walls. Mrs. Kircher asked what
type businesses woultl be going in the boil Jing. Mr. Simpson said Few not at
liberty to say who the prospective tenants w but that the buildi ngawould be used
Tar offices, and so e showroom-office-warehouse type businesses. Mr. Bryant stated
the facility would be s milar to the Longwood Business Center on 434. Mr. Mei neke
questioned the del eti on~of a retention ar on plan. Mr. Simpson stated thet the
City Engineer suggested it be del etetl a it was not ne sa ry; he said a 12 foot wide
driveway fora drive-in teller window was tentatively planned for that ar Motion
by Mr. Smeril son, s ontl by Mrs. Kircher to re mnend approval to Li ty Conmission of
the Baywood Center Site Plan as presented. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call
vote.
4. Consideration of Possible Rezonin of Jud e Pro ert -Parcel 6, r ar portion,
from R-3 to C-3, located between 1)-92 ontl East Street. Mr. Walter Judge present.
Mr. Bryant requested that Mr. Judge make the presentation. Mr. Judge stated Chat
when he requested annexation of Parcel 6 into the Li ty, his intention was to use the
r portion of the parcel for two 8-unit apartments. It was re gmnended Co him at
that time to go to a Commercial z ninq because of the Al ber[son's property already
being Commercial. He stated that he and Mr. Zinmer own the two adjacent parcels, 5
and I, and a n the process of re inq the r r portions oT 5 and I from a
sidential x q to a Commercial z ing prloreto a ing into the Lf ty (front
portion of Pa~cel~] is presently in the an xa Lion process now). Mr. Judge stated
that there was a strong possibility of twonmaj or tenants co ii ng on the front portion
o he decided that the R-3 on Parcel 6 would not be the best possible use of the
property a it would be in the middle of property which he i the process of r ing
to Commercial in the County. He stated that County Comm ssioner Sandra Glenn wa se in
agreement that the best use of the property woultl be Commercial, there was discussion
ing on East Street behind Al bertson's property. Mr. Judges ted there w
someo duel exec there now and the remainder of vacs t property was owneda by Mr. Rifeere
Land Planning Agency
December 9, 1981
Page 2
There is also sane Comnerci al property (still in the County) on East Street close to
434. Mrs. Kircher said she wa rued that [he residents on East Street we
against Comnerci al developments c^inceJudge said their co er the in asetl
traffic being generated vn East Street and said he was notrpl anni ng any ac
from tM1e Cononerc ial a ea to East Street. Ne stated that an R-3 Bevel opmentcon sEast
Street would generatermore traffic on East Street. Mr. Mei neke asked if a wall or
shrubbery buffer would be erected along East Street. Mr. Judge said he felt a
shrubbery buffer would be the more desirable buffer. Mr. Judge said Parcel 6 is
already in the City and M1e knows that he should have requested Comnerci al before he
ex ed in but that he wa noi, at that time, c nsi Berl ng a Commercial tleve lopment
for the property. He stated that if the County denies Lhe R-1 on Parcels 5 and ] to
go to Coimnerci al, he would not request the Toni n9 change fran R~~3 to Loamerci ai o
the re r of Parcel fi. He stated he is only as ki n9 for approval of the R-3 going to
Lanmerci al contingent on the County all owl n9 the rear portions of Parcels 5 and ] to
go to Lommerci al, otherwise he will request staying R-3. Mrs. Kircher said she did
not understand why he was asking for LPA's re mmendati pns. Mr. Judge stated he
s advised that this would be the proper procedure. Mr. Meine ke suggested that
LPA could re mmend that this be changed to L~imerci al if Mr. Judge su ceeds i
getting [he approval on Parcels 5 and ) bei n9 re oned to Conine rci al. Mr. Judge said
that he needed the Li ty's re ommendati on to proceed to the County for change of
ni ng. Mrs. Kircher Said she could not make a mnentlat ion without knowi n9 what
the residents feelings ar Mrs. Kircher was a uretl that a Public Hearing would be
held and all residents within 300 feet of the property would be notified of the
ni ng and Public Hearing. It was not clear as to who would hold the Public
Heaoi ng, the Cavn ty or Che City, but the LPA was as ured that a Public Hearing would
be held and the citizens would have an opPOrtuni ty tp be heard.
5. Motion by Mr. Mei neke, second by Mrs. Kircher to re onmend approval, to City
Lanmi ssi on, of the re ning of Judge Property, rear Portion of Parcel 6, from R-3
to Conine rci ai with theoconti ngen cy that other adjacent parcels a e approved by
Seminole Lounty for Lomnerci al zoning. Motion carried by a una nlmous roll call vote.
6. Motion to adjourn meeting by Mr. Smerilson, second by Mrs. Kircher. Motion
earriea unae,mo~sly.
Geri Zambri
Secretary
La ntl Planning Agency
~i.lo.i~ ~, ,„~E,,,,
(Qi4q n#'giangfnnnD ,
trs pa~et 711,rre~~ ~_. a-s~.. 'a5 ~-,
3fivng(nund, ~'Ivcidv 33rs8 -
YEe1. 831-8555 ~'
December 14, 1981
T0: R. A. BRVANT, BDI LD ING OFFICIAL
RE: SITE PLAN - AOVENTeRE [NTE ANNTIONAL, INC.
Lots 26 and 2l, Longda le Industrial Park
[ M1ave re ewed the above referenced project and Find that it meets
alt City Codes and requirements with the exception of the following:
The Li ty Engineer states in his letter of pecember 8, 1981,
that the 15" culvert under the driveway should be eliminated
and the driveway installed no more than 4" above the bottom
of the iwa le.
The plan should be re sed o a letter submitted, showi nq canpl is nce
o£ this requirement, as stated above, will be adhered to. At this
time, a buitdf ng permit may be issued.
/~tr
L; ty £ Lgegwooa,ri ida
DOL:gdz ^