CC05-24-82AgendaCITY O32fISSION
tnNamn, FIARID.4
M4Y 24 1982 PlA]0.4 ]:30 P.M,
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION PND PLED OF ALLEGIANCE 1U Tf@ UNT1'Ep SLATES F'[AG
3. APPROVAL OF rIIMILES, 5/1]/82 REGfIIAR FETING
4. F1RSf R£ADIIYG, ORDIWNCE NO. 552, AMENDLJG THE OJDES EPSFDRCQSfNL ORDIlYM'CE
OF CTPY OF IfJ[NQ~GOD Ar4NDIl3G 4AILDING OF SECTION 3 (.MtISDICPION) AND ArB'SIDI[~G
NIFBR OF ZONING ORDIICM'CE £RIX~t 143 1D 495
5. CITY AC!@IISriNTOft'S REPORT:
ZONIl~G CLASSIFICATION FJR TIBERON F!IILS SUBDMSION
b. RLFt@BISHING QJLtSIDUS }L1R&JLR SElJ&Q PUUVL
PROBLEM WITH FIID LIGHPS AT B4LL FSEfD, CACIDYIAND PARK
d. 0RIPLIANCE WITH SITE PLHN R-'jUIItFMENPS BY PEMBFRTON, Ilv'C.
e. RFgUESl OF IANQ:LGD B.4BTISL CHHRCH TO USE NDBILE HONE A$
TfT40RARY CLhSSRCOM FUR A PERIOD OF 1421 YE4R$ (S'UH~IITTED BY
MR. CHARLES SefITH, StE41ARD$HIP 0RPtLT1EE)
b. CITY AT1ORrffiY'S REPoRT:
]. MAYOR AND IXkP455L0[v5R'S RE'FroRTE:
8. ADJOURN
D. L. TE'[titY
CITY CLERK
PERSONS ARE ADVIS® TWAT IF TFff.Y DECIDE. 1U APPEAL MR' OECISZONB MODE AT
'1f1ESE EffARIlxS, TkiEY H*IIZ NEED A REWRD OF THE YFOL'E®UJGS AND FUR SUCH
PURFOSES, TFIEY 4)ILL NEED 1U INSURE THAT A VERH4TSi REOCRD OF TfE PRO®PKS
IS MADE, WHIIX REOJRD Il3CLUOES THE TESPIIDNY ArID EVIDENCE UFOri WNLCH Tf1E
APPEAL IS M4DE. Tl~ CITY OF EANQ~[YJD DOES NJT PROVIDE THIS VERHATITt RECORD.