Resolution 95-807RESOLUTION NO. 95-30'9
APO
JR
WF~[ 2 ~.. ~ ~ itinue to
pm end ~~ , ages ~n[
of Ye..
~ .i~~ Yi
n
On.
T'. ~ n
Ot Y. 1995.
Nn ,.~R
Signature Page
Seminole Cowty NPUES Part 1 Application
foc the
Murvripal Separate Storm Sewer System
As Lead/Co-Applicant, we certify under penalty of Imr thae rhis document and all attachmen4
re prepared under our direction or supervision in accordanm with a system designed to
re drat quali[ied persormelproperly gather and evaluate the irJormation submitted. Based
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the iNOrmation submitted is o the best of our
knowledge and belief, we, accurate, and complete. We are aware that there are significant
penalties for sobmltnng false information, induding the posslbllity ~ and impdsormtent
for knowing violadons. Shis cereification is applicable oNy to the ~ amahon relating to the
Leed/CO-Applicant kx wtlleh I am signing on the date indicated.
T
Seminole County -Lead Applicant City of Longw.,.,.,
Randall C Morris Mayor William Winston
County Commision Chairman
Data Uate:~~! -~
City of Altamonte Springs Gry ofof Oviedo
Mayor Dudley Bates Mayor Judith Green
Date: Date:
City of Casselbeny Glty o[ SaNord
Mayor IIrum Pronocos't Maynr petty Smith
City of Lake Mary ity o! W~ Sprin
Mayor Lowry Rockett ayor john Bush
Date: Dater // ~'(~ /`775
¢RLOCAL A PROOIDING S T APPLICATION F
~ 6E
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 995, by and between the CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPAIN ,
a Florida municipal corporate whose address is 225 Newburyport
Aven Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, the CITY OF CABSELBERRY, a
Florida municipal corporation, whose address rs 95 Triplet Lake
Dr1ve, asselberry, Florida 32]0]; the CITY OF LAKE MARY, a Florida
municipal corporation, whose address is Post Office Box 950]00,
Lake Mary, Florida 32795-0]OO; the CITY OF' LONGWOOD, whose address
is 1]5 West Warren, Longwood, Florida 32]50; the CITY OF OVIEDO,
01 , the CITY OF BANFORO, a Florlda Municipal Corporation whose
address is Post Office Box 1] anford, Florida 32])2-1]00; and
the CITY OF WINTER SPAIN , whose address is 1126 East State Road
434, Winter Springs, Florida 327 , hereinaftee referred to as
CITIES or CITY, and SEMI NOLE COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Florida, whose address rs Seminole County Sezvlces
Building, 1101 East Pirst Street, Sanford, Florida 322 hereinaf-
ter referred to as COUNTY."
WN¢A¢ the CITIES and COUNTY desire to protect and promote
the public health, safety and general welfare through the manage-
ment of stormwater runoff; and
WH¢A¢AS, the CITIES and COUNTY desire to maintavn and assist
in the improvement of water quality and to preserve and enhance the
environmen tai quality of streams and receiving ware , and
WEEREAe, pursuant to Section 402 (p)(2), Federal Clean Water
Act (ewA), ertain political entities are required to implement
stoxmwater management programs within certain time frames, and
FAEAEAe, pursuant to cWA requirements, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed regulations
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES)
permit program published as Part 4 , Code of Federal Regulations
(C.F.R.J Section 122.26 on Novembee 16, 1990, 55 FR 4]990; and
WHEREAS, Section 122.26(aJ (1j, C.F. , provides that storm-
water permits be required for large and medium municipal separate
storm sewer systems, as determined from the 1990 census, and
Appendix Z to Section 122, C.F.R., designates the COUNTY as a
medium municipal separate storm sewer system) and
WREREAB, the EPA, Region IV, notified the COUNTY and CITIES by
letter dated Decembee 16, 1993, that the CITIES axe designated as
part of the COUNTY municipal separate storm sewer system for the
purposes of NPDES permitting, a copy of which is attached hereto
and Incorporated herein as Exhibit "A," and
WEEREAS, to effect a cooperative permit application approach
with the COUNTY as lead applicant and the CITIES as co-applicants,
the COUNTY and CITIES executed an agreement dated August 30, 19 ,
to complete and submit a NPDES Part permit application for
municipal separate Storm sewer systems; and
i1HERE it is the mutual desire of the CITIES and COUNTY to
continue Che cooperative relationship and delegate responsibilities
Por developing the NPDES Part 2 permit application as outlined in
Sect2On 122.26, 40 C.F.R.
NON, TEEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
agreements and promises contained herein, and other good and
valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged by the parties, the CITIES AND CO[RiTY mutually
agree as follows:
Rection 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct
have relied.
eeotion 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set
forth the relationship between the CITIES and COONTY with respect
to the following:
(a) To define the general responsibilities of the lead
applicant and co-applicants in developing the NPD 5 permit appLica-
tion outlinetl in section 122.26, 40 C.F.R.
(b) To establish a cost allocation method to ensure equitable
distxi bution of program costs.
Section 3. General Responsibilities.
(a) The COUNTY shall function as the lead applicant and will
engage a consultant to assist in preparation of Paxt 2 of the
application for an NPDES Part 2 permit as set forth in The Scope of
Work For stormwater NPDES Permat Application - Paet 2, attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "E," and in accordance
with Section 122. 4a C.F.R.
(b) The COUNTY shall review and approve the fees submitted by
the consultant to complete the work.
(c) The COUNTY shall administer the consultant's contract.
(d) The COUNTY as lead applicant shall have the following
responsibilities:
(1) The COUNTY shall manage the project, direct and
correspond with the consultant and rnvo lve the eo-applicants in the
development of the permit application and copy the co-applicants
with correspondence from the EPA.
(2) The COUNTY or its consultant shall correspond with
the EPA and schedule regular meetings with the co-applicants.
(e) The CITIES as co-applicants shall:
(1) Submit all project correspondence to COUNTY.
(2) Appoint a representative to attend meetings, review
and comment on consultant submittals and the permit application,
and to receive correspondence from the COUNTY.
(s( Provide the required information to prepare the
CITIES' portion of the application in a timely manner.
(4( The current time schedule for submission of
information is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
"C.
sectroa a. cost Allocation.
(a) The CITIES and COUNTY shall share the cost of the permit
application. The cost to the CI'CI ES and COUNTY shall be distribut-
ed based upon the population within each respective jurisdiction.
A drstribution of costs expressed in percentage shares is set forth
in Exhibit "U, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
(b) The COUNTY shall forward an invoice and a cost allocation
breakdown to the CITIES. The CITIES shall forward the indicated
share of an vnvovice to the COUNTY within forty (40) days of
receipt. The COUNTY shall pay the Pull amount of the consultant's
eectio¢ 5. Copies. Upon completion of the permit applica-
tion, a copy shall be provided to each CITY and the COUNTY as
provided in Section 12 hereinafter.
6ectvoa 6. Co-Applicants' Responsibility. The CITIES, as
co-applican<s, recognize that the COUNTY as "lead applicant"
carrves with it no designated or implied authority over any other
munvcipality in the COUNTY, whether a application is submitted in
conjunction with the "lead applicant" or separately. Further,
regardless of the number o permits vssued, unless otherwise
establishes through a separate agreement, each co-applicant vs
responsible for discharges from within its boundaries, as it
applies to Part 2.
&ectro¢ ]. Withdrawal f[om Patticipaticn. A CITY may
withdraw from participation in this Agreement, up to and including
the time of submission of the application to the EPA, if it
determines that it 1s no longer in its best interest to apply £or
a NPOES permit as a co-applicant with the COUNTY. Such withdrawal
wrthdrawing party's governing board. If a CITY withdraws under the
foregoing procedure vt shall remavn obligated to pay a pro-rata
share of costs incurred, pursuant to Exhibit '• ,•' during t e period
[t remavned a co-applicant.
6ection e. Permit Zmplementation. £ach CITY shall be solely
responsible for implementation of the permit content within the
boundaries of its respective jurisdiction, as vt applies to Paet 2.
The representat eves from the CITIES shall be responsible for
assuring the terms of the application axe acceptable. The CITIES
and COUNTY recognize that an implementation schedule may be
included in Ue final permit application. It is the intent of this
Agreement that the CITIES and COUNTY agree, subject to budgetary
constravnts and other financial considerations, to complete
implementation of the Part 2 application according to the applica-
tion schedule as approved by the EPA. A separate agreement
concerning a cooperative implementation approach may be considered
after issuance of the permit or permits.
sect[ov s. Adoption of Legal Authority. The CITIES and
COUNTY agree, upon completion of Part 2 of the application, to
consider and, if the CITIES and COUNTY determine that such action
vs vn the best interest of the CITIES oe COUNTY, adopt, modify or
amend any ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations or policies
necessary to obtain permit app oval.
Section 10. Budget. The parties hereto recognize that under
there respective legal powers they are unable to obligate them-
selves legally to spend funds in excess of one (1) budget year;
however, t e parties do hereby bend themselves to complete the term
of this Agr ement as they may be able to under the laws of [he
State of Plorida, and agree to appropriate funds subject to
budgetary constraints and other financial considerations.
eectaon 11. Indemnity. To the extent allowed by law, each
party agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the others,
their boards and commrssrons, officials, officers, employee nd
judgments, payments, recover res, and suits of any kind, arrsing out
of or occurring as a result of any act or omission of its officers,
employees, or agents rn connectron with this Agreement. The
foregoing rs not intended as a waiver of the benefits of Section
All notices provided for herein shall
changed by a pasty upon proper written notice to The others as
provided below:
CITY of AL
city engineer
ewburyport A
Altamonte SpringsVeFLe 32"!01
(40'!) 830-3857
cZTY O ERRY
sty engineer
riplet Lake D
sel6erry, F 32707
(40"1) 263-1912
TY MARY
ity Engineer
Lake MaryCeFlorida0'32 "195-0'100
(407) 324-3000
Y a GNO
City Engineer
1]5 West W
onpwooa, Fio~iaaVe3nso
(ao~) zs3-z393
cZTx o eo
city engineer
Alexandria eovie~ara
o~ieae, eloriaa 3z>s5
~a o-1~ see-o ooo ere. nos
exmx oz sANFOxo
City Engineer
Post Office Box 1798
winter Springs, FL 32J0e
(40'J) 327-1800
Show, P
istant C unty Engineee
ublic W Department/Engineering Oivisi on
LakesMary Blvd, Suite 200
anford, F
(40)) 323-2500'Ext. 5]09
Sectioe 13. Term, unless otherwise extended by agreement of
the parties hereto, this Agreement shall terminate upon submission
of the NPOES Part p mat ppl ication which Porms its subject
6 action ia. SevexaDility. If any part of this Agreement is
found invalid or unenforceable by any Court, such invalidity or
unenforceability shall not affect the other p is of this Agr ement
if the rights and obligations of the parties contained herein are
not materially prejudiced and if the intentions of the parties can
continue to be effected. To that end, this Agreement is declared
severable.
eectioa 15. Sffact. This instrument constitutes the entire
Agreement between the parties and supersedes all previous discus-
sions, understandings and agreements, verbal or written, between
additions, alterations or variations of this Agreement shall be
expressly set forth in writing and duly signed by the parties
by the parties hereto.
6ectioa 15. Aasig~ent. This Agreement shall be binding on
the parties hereunder and their representatives and successors.
obligations hereunder to any other parties without the prior
written consent of the other parties hereto.
6ectiov f]. Anvexatiov Laws. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained herei this Agreement shall not be construed or
.interpreted to contract away the rights and authority of the CITIES
pursuant to the Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act, Chapter
1 , Florida Statutes, as amended from time to time, or shall
anything herein be construed to contract away the COl]NTY'$ right to
challenge any annexation in acco[dance with the laws of the State
of FlOriaa.
Section 13. PuD1ic records Lav. Each party acknowledges its
obligations under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, to release public
records to members o£ the public upon request. Each party
ackaowledges it is required to comply with Chapter 119, Florida
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the lawful representative of the pasties
ey:
PAT WAINRIGHT, City C1eek J. DUDLEY BATES, Mayor
Date:
ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE MARY
eY:
CATT(~~RyyO/~~L$ A. /FOSTER, Crty Clerk LOwRY/£y~. ROCKETT, Mayor
.,GRALDINE' ZAMBRi, City Clerk WILLIAM WINSTON, Mayor
D v
Date:..J~'~~~>
ATTEST: CITY OF OVIEDO
By:
c2NDY S. EONHAM, Crty Clerk JUDITH GRE , Mayor
Oate:
ATTEST: CITY OF SANFORD
By:
JANET R. DONAHO£, city clerk BETTYE D. sMITH, Mayor
~,.~~~ fib, 6 > Bv: F M T ~` /
it~ JO BDSH, Mayor
~R~a M. ~~;;~ Da ~ ~sys
cler and of
ntytC of
Seminole County,nFlor ida.
For the u and iel fiance
nole C my only.
Approved as touform and
legal sufficiency.
county Attorney
ey:
RANBALL C. MORRIS, Chairman
uthorized fore cation by
then and of ty Commrs-
e at their ou ,
_, regular meeting.
sco/are
os/~ozp~s
VAttachmentsan
4 Exhibit ~'A"- Letter from E
Exhibit "B - cope Of WorkPF ormwater NPW£.B Permit
Application-PartrZSt
Exhibit eliveiables from Engineer
Exhibit "0 - erstribution of Costs/SOint Permit Application
<~ile is i,-1
4~ ~~ ~ unireo srarES errv:aa n o ray Pftor tcriom acEmcv
Dec enib ar 16, 1993
RETNRN RECEIPT REO[IEETED UU~~~~~~(~J
ftEF: 4wM-WPEH ~~ 1 ~ ~1Y~
nald Rabun
County N pager
SenunoleaCOUnty
1101 E. First St
Dear Mr. Rabun
Water quality problems in urbanived watersheds ar a major
' ental c e nationwide. The Water quality Act (WQA) of
198] amended thenClean Water Act (CWA or Actj to add Section
402 (p) requiring EPA to develop regulations under the National
Pollutant - scharge Elivunation System (NPDES) permit program to
address storm water discharges to waters o£ the United States.
^ The implementing regulations w e published in Part 40 0£ the
Code o£ Federal Regulations (ceF.A.) 5 122.26 on November 16,
1990, 55 FA 4]990. The Federal Register containing the
regulations and a urtmary a nc losed. Although the n
requirements c not be £ullyediscussed in this letter, EPA,
Region Iv, w notify you of a e taking pursuant
to the authority at Section 402(p) of rthe CWAar
sec tio,: 402(p) o£ the Act provides that storm water permits may
t be required £or certain storm water discharges until after
October 1, 1992, extended to October 1, 1999 by the water
- a -evelopment Act of 1992, cept £or storm water
discharges listed under Section 402(p)(2). One a cepted class of
discharges includes the ae Erom a unit ipal separate storm a er
system s ing a population of 100,v000 o e but less thaw w
250,OOO~~e(medium m cipal system). Ia a ordance with 40 C.P.R.
S 122.2fi(b)(])(i) and the data from the 1990 C compiled by
the H of C A Region Z s hereby identifying pour
cipality, and tho ePlieted in Table 1, ae being subject to
therNPnaS permit application zequiremente of 40 C.P.R. S 122.26.
The application c iate of t o (2i parts. Part 1 shall be
submitted to BPA Aeqion N bywTUne 12, 1995, and Pazt 2 by
Suns 13, 1996.
In addition t those m cipalitiea listed i Tab 1e 1 meeting the
above populat n criteria, we have the-authority to designs te, on
^ e-by-caaeobaeie, other m cipal separate etozm s
systems (ns4) as part of a medium munrc ipal separate storm sewer
system. These designations a e based o ither the
relationship between she s red isc harges of the
cipality m ing the population c a (a regulated
cipality) and the sto m sewer discharges of the designated
c ipalitiea, o the proximity of disc haxges Erom the
designated m cipalities to discharges from a regulated
cipalityunr making the determinations, EFA may c Sider:
(1)rphys ical interconnections between m cipal separate storm
s (see 40 C. F. 5 122.26(b)(Bj ]) (2) the proximity of
discharges Erom theWdesigna[ed mun cipalities to discharges from
the listed m cipalities ~3) theigna ntity and nature of
pollutants discharged to w of the united s (4) the
nature of the xec elving waters, and (5) othez relevant £actora.
In o attempt t apply these regulations, v with the State
officials on November 4, 1993, to discuss stormnwater permitting
Florida. aed on that meeting and the above regulatory
aidarationaa, we have determined that all the mun cipal
eepazate s systems withi¢ your c unty should be
deaignatedtaaparteof the unty •e eepazate storm a system
£or the parpose of obtaining NPDSS permit c rage.eVTherefore,
those mu cipalitiee ar requized to submit ao hTD85 application
for th=_ixreepaxate etozm e r diechazgee (See enclosed Table 1).
Designated m cipalities have the a e part 1 and 2 application
submittal deadlines as the regulatedmunrcipalitie s.
Although eep orate storm a -system applications may be
submitted and perm uedro individual basis, this
apFroach would be administratively burdensome £or E ,. States,
and s cipalities t nave. Such a approach would also v Ault
a piecemeal s wat ex program £ox a given city o unty. '
As a cult of the extensive interrelationship between diEEerent
cipal s systems within the c unty and the proximity
ofndischarges end that the ant b the lead
pplicant. In addition, w also suggesting that the
designated cities and towns within the c unty boundary should-be
anpl icant s. This approach i intent with other storm
water related activities for manycofsthe c unties in the State of
Florida where etozm water utility districts have been Formed.
?he state of Florida~s storm water m nagement program is based on
watershed approach to reduce atormawater pollutant loads as eet
Forth in eta to water policy (Chapter 12-40, Florida
Administrative Code). We believe this approach will yield
Favorable a ental r salts and will be administratively
orkable. Aleo~nthe coetaof submitting the permit application
n be shar~f tTi-C Tre~an3 would n ae
burdensome t ether andrvidual m cipality. Co-permitteesbe
ould be responsible only for thendisc harges within the
boundaries of their municipality.
pny m icipality may submit an individual application; however,
you must discuss reepe na ibilities fox any shared ou tfalle with
any adjacent m cipality. also contacting Florida
Department o£ Transportation and Chapter 298 Special Districts
that o and operate separate etozm a systems, within the
unties listed i Table 1, of their being designated pur euant to
the authority discussed in this letter.
Enp has c ordinated with the Florida pepar ent of Envire~ental
retection to schedule a orkahop i 11, 1994,
to discuss these regulations with theTregu a ergna e
MS4a in greater detail. This m ing will beeatathe eoliday Inn,
Ashley Plaza, Convention Centerealll Weat Fortune Street, Tampa,
Florida, £rom 8:30 a to 4:00 p. m. Future individual meetings
with EPA may also be arranged.
We a xequa rng any m cipality to attend this workshop,
but strongly en urage youxnand/or your repre entative(e)
presence. Someoo£ the, small m cipalities may not o and
operate a storm a system but, they should attend to hear how
thi e-program may apply to them in the future. Enclosed a
documents that will a iet you in preparing £or this w kehop.
By copy o£ this letter, w also informing the designated
cipalities of o x determination and request that they
sssly c cider becoming a -applicant with other
cipalities; othezwiae, individual applications will be
required. Thank you in advance Eor your cooperation.
Sf you have any questions, please feel free t act the Storm
Water Permit Writer listed in Table'1 £or the county and the
municipalitrea within it.
Sincerely yours,
W. Ra~ nin9 pr~
Water nagement
Enclosures (9)
cc. Municipalities listed in Seminole County
.i H%NIBIT A
ogion N
PLORIDA MONICSPAL a
POR NPD
PRAMIT
wRITRn -4 -
OBTRAMINATION O
wATBR APPLICANTS
83 PBRNITB
INCOAPOAATRD
ARRAS wITRIN
ROOLATRD
MDNICIPALITY
eIZe
Lee Medinm
Jeannie McNeill Cape Coral
404/34]-3012,
ext. 29]] Fort Myers
Sanibel
Leon
Michael Mitchell
Tallahassee
Medium
404/34]-3012,
ext. 2951 '
Manatee Medium
Jeannie-McNeill Anna Maria
zadenton
~' Bradenton S ach
Holmes Beach
Longboat Rey
_ Pa LneEto
~_ Medium
Caroline Ej imofor Dade City
406/34]-3012, New Port Richey
ext. 29]8 .Port Richey
Saint Leo
S
A
t
i
'
an
n
on
o
Zephyrhills
Seminole - Medium
Sienita Ricfiardson Altamonte Springs
404/34]-3012, Casselberry
ext. 2950 Lake Maxy
Longwood
Wiedo
Sanford
winter Springs '
r Population
Census data c siderations a e based on the 1990 U.
. on S. Bureau of
,wa
EXHIBIT B
SEMllVOLE COUNTY
STOItMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SCOPE OF WORK FOR
STORMWATER NPDES i'ERMIT APPLICATION -PART 2
As required by recene feduel regulations, the unincorporated Seminole County (COUNTY), as
waH as Ineorpomted cities within the County and the Florida Department of Transportation, are
required to submit permit applications for their municipal separate storm sewer systems (M54).
To this end, the COUNTY has contracted with Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM), referred
ro below as the ENGEJEER, to complete the perrrut applications for the COUMY and co-
apphcenfs. The NPDES MS4 permit appliahona will be completed in two parts. Part 1 defines
the edsHngstormwater management sysrema for the COUNTY and co-applicants and is covered
under x separate scope of work. fart 2 proposes the Future stormwater management programs
for the COUNTY and arapplimnts. The scope o(work contained herein defines the tasks to be
ompleted by the ENGINEER for the preparatlon of Pact 2 of the apptlcadon. Uewuse of EPA
deadlines, the Part 2 permit applleatlon will be del Ivered to EPA on or befoee June 12, t99fi. The
tasks ro be completed by the ENGINEER are defined below.
TASK V COORDINATION AND LIAISON
The ENGINEER will work with the COUNTY for the continued cooperation among co-applicants
including the cities and the Florida Department of TrartsporfeHOn. The ENGINEER will attend
t2 monthly meetings with the COUNTY and co-applicants to discuss the st s of the
apptlcatlon, and to obtain pectlnent Information from ehe COUNTY and cu-applicants.
The ENGEJEER wLl also meet with the US Envlromnenfal Protection Agency (EPA) staff to
discuss the status end the interim results of the wet-season monitoring and Hre Comprehensive
Sformwater Management Program. The meeting wtll attempt to aehleve a consensus on the
dlre<HOn of [he Part 2 effort prior to submittal of the appiicedon Itself.
,.afwa
TASK VI PREPARATION OE PAAT?APPLICATION
TASK VI~l DOCUMENTATION OF ADEQUATL LEGAL AUTHORITY
In Parf 2 of the perrrut npplication, the COUNTY and co-applicants must dmmonstrate that they
have the legal authority by statute, ordinance or a series of conhacts to control the discharge of
pollution into eheir storm sewer system, ro require compliance and to carry out inspections,
veiilaneeand mor~iroringprocedures. During the Part I evaluation of existing legal authority,
language for new or eevised ordinances/regulations was suggested. The ENGINEER will meet
with the COUNTY and co-applicant legal representative to discuss the application mlatlve to
adequate legal zuthority. 'Phe ENGINEERS will daument new or proposed language for [he
Part 2 permit appllcafiov.
TASK VI-2 UPDATE PART]SOURCE IDENTIFICATION
Th¢ ENGINEER will update the Pert 1 outfall maps to include outfalls discovered after the Part
outfall maps were completed. If a new outfall is discovered, the ENGEJEER w01 mazk the
outfall on a copy of the Part 1 maps, confirm the discovery with the COUNTY or co-applicant
and Identify the outfall on the AufoCAD coverage of NPDES outfalls. Final maps will be
prepared by the ENGEJEER for We Part 2 pemilt application, if changes were made.
The £NGtNEER will prepare an inventory of facilities which discharges ro the M54 a[ormwater
ated with industrial activity. The inventory will Include tho name and address of the
sal
facility, and description of the principal products or services provided by each facility (e.g.,SIC
code).
TASK Via fMPLEMENTATfON OF WET WEATHER SAMPLING PLAN
The ENGINEL;2 will complete the representative outfall sampling program as approved by the
US EPA according ro the Part 1 Appliation. The ENGWEERw{II obeain the necessary sampling
equipment Including four (4) xutosamplers with and Itowmefers, gcab.vamphng equipment and
ampler boxes. Material and labor to provide site protucnon (e.g., fenung) will be provided
bytihe COUNTY. The ENGINEER wilt Iw.rfe anU set up the eulosamplers of the appropriate
Ixatione, and provide for the periodic maintenance of the autosz~nplers. Th¢ ENGINFER will
provide the sampling crews ro service the amosamplers and obtain composite and grab samples
(or acmptable storm events, The F,NGINEFR will also move the samplers from site to site, as
sexy w collect the required number of snmples from each site. The sampling crews will
also ttarwpprt the samples to the selected laboratory for analysis witltin the acceptable time
hame.
Three acceptable storm events will be sampi i al each o[ seven (~ sites Grab and composite
ampler will be obrained end delivered to the lnboratoy. Laboratory costs are included in the
fee proposal. Ilse laboratory will not analyze the rumples unh] notified by the ENGINEER that
the storm event was acceptable. I[ the smrin event is nu cceptable, the samples will be
discarded. A1I of the acceptable samples will be analy.ed foe the following paraineten in
a,w~
zddiHOn to the required organics antl metals listed in Appendix D of 40 CER 122 (in all,
approximately 14o parameters):
Total Suspended Solids (S55)
Total Dissolved Solids ("[DE)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5-day) (BOD,)
Oil and Grease
Total Ammonia plus OrgaNC Nitrogen
Total [Celdahl Nitrogen RKN)
Nihare plus Nitrite Nitrogen
Dissolved Phosphorus
Total Phosphorus (TP)
Pecnl Coliform
Neal Streptococws
• pH
[f the COUNtt is regwred by EPA to provide wet weather eampiing for more or less than seven
(~ sites, based upon mutual wrinen agreement with the COUNTY and 6NGWEER, per site
end fees may be added or subtracted. Per site services include laboratory costs, site
setup elite maintenance, and on site sampling services. Per site fees are identified on Exhibit D.
The 6NGINEF.R will compile the sampling data collected into a sprnadsheet. The spreadsheet
wiH Include general In(ormaHOn about each reprasema[ive ou[lali such as:
OuHatl location (dettriptive latitude and longitude)
Ouhall type (pipe, dtannel)
Drainage a
Receiving water
Lana nae (percent impervious, resldea,naf, mmmeednl, inansmat
imry)
Upstream BMPS (type, removal efficienues)
Precipitation ([Drat, duration, nntecedentdry period)
Runoff (volume, peek Flow)
• Even[ Mean Concentrations (EMCs)
Based on sromt event monitoring darn, pollmm~r loading srahstics will be compiled for chose
pollutants dereued in stormwater runoff. The ENGINEER will calculate EMCs from the runoff
hydrograph using a llaw weighted composite sample.
EMCs based on the COUNTY'S representative outfall monitoring program will be compared to
the FMCS from the Iltenture.
~~/w~
TASK VI-4 STORMWATER POLLIITAM LOADS AND FMCS
TASK VI4.t Estimate MuNCipality-Wide stormwater Pollutant Is~ads and Even[ Meen
Concentmhons
The ENGINEER will develop sormwater pollutant Toads for BOD, COD, TEE, TDB, TN, total
Na plus organic nitrogen, TP, dissolved phosphorus, cadmium copper lead and zinc. The
loads will be developed for each of the tb major basins. Pollutant load estimates will also be
compiled far the COUNTY and each coappliant (total and wltliln each basin).
The ENGINEER will define the stormwater pollutant loads using the Watershed Management
Model, developeA (or the pwpose o[ simulafbtg the pollutant loads resulting from the runoff
from various land uses. The ENGr[JEEIi will use the existing land use maps for the model. 'Che
xishng reglonat BMPs such as wet detention ponds will be obtained from Me Part 1 penNt
application information, and from additional information provided by the COUNTY and co-
applicants The EMCs wilt be based upon data collected during ehe wet weather sampling The
ENGINEER wilt augment fhe wet weather sampling resnik with EMCs found In the lltera[ure.
TASK VI-42 Uevelop Schedule for Providing Estimates of Annual/Beasonal Coad and
EMC far Pollutanes Detected
The ENGINEER will prepare a plan with associated schedule !or the eatimahnn of axmual and
naI loads for pollutants detected in significant quenfltles in Hte wee weather sampling as
well as for the estimation of pollutant loading hom each major ontfall. The plan will include
the parameters to be studied, sampling and analysis methods to be used, and a schedue for the
completion of tLJs effort during the duration of the permit (5 years afeer iesuaace).
TASK VlS CONTINLIOIIS MONTf'ORING PROGRAM DESIGN
The ENGIIJEER wilt design a compliance m ring program for the COUNTY and co-
applicants. Initially, Nte INGINEER will mnside~ 3 ro 5 of the representative ouballs cad
ring iastream sampling statiotss identified during Part i. The ENGINEER will recommend
ampling frequency for the monitoring program. The sampling frequency will
include a recommendation for the mlNmum rainfall threshold Q.e., oral volume and storm
depeh) considered slgNftcant and a seasonal distribufion of storm events (e.g. moNtor 4 norms
during [all and winter and e storms during spring and summer). The ENGINEER will also
idemi[y parameters to be sampled.
The ENGIIJEER will design the compliance monioring program ro provide data m support the
following management appllea[ions
~ liefne pour t t load'ng_(t,,ttgg This may requi events to be
momtored over a ange of hydro-nteteomlogic coati ii s~m
alwo
• py1 1 fC ' Thls typically require
palretl m APO Ing st bons (eg. inflow/out-ow, or BMP control/no BMP
conKOlj. o
COMPREHENSfVE STO
The FWGWE6R will pr¢pare an analysis of the COUNTY'S and <o-applicants' programs related
reducing stormwater pollution to the "maximum extent practicable" (MEP7. Based upon the
Part 1 permit application which idenHHed existing management programs, the ENG-JEER will
describe and assess whether or not additional management programs are required for the co-
applicants in the following areas:
rat and source controls;
operation and maintenance of stormwater facilities;
• planning activities including master plamring;
operaHOn and maintenance n( public roads;
• ^ood management projects;
• tanditll and treatment, storage and disposal facatity morvronng;
• handling of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer;
noI o3 illicit comrections;
• public reporting of illicit connection and illegal spills;
public eda~c
trot of sar~imry sewer seepage;
oral controls of construcHOn sites; and,
• assocated statfing and equipment.
For management programs which need enhancement, the F:NGWEEIi will describe the added
programs and estimate the armual costs for the added programs. The added management
programs will be based on the information on existing programs will be obtained from Part 1
of the MS4 permit application, hom a gnesdormaire prepared by the P,NGW EER and f-1ed out
by the COU.UIYond each co-applicznt, and from interviews with the COUN'fYand co-applicant
staff.
The ENGINEER will perfomt [he services associated with this Disk far the Florida Department
of Traaspoztadon if requested in writing from the COUNTY. lire fees associated with these
additional servicev have not bean included in EXHIBIT D.
=m,.gwe..
TASK VI-7 ASSF.SSMEM OF MANAGEMEM PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS
Tha BNGINEFR mill quantitatively, where possible, and oMerwlse quall[atlvely, assess the
effectiveness of the management programs desttibed in Task VIfi. The ENGINEER will use the
Watershed Management Model to project annual stormwater pollution loadings "with" and
without" the recommended management program, i(the program can be quantified. Loading
projections will be developed for the conventional pollutants specified in the NPDES regulations
for management program effectiveness xs Armual loading projections will be
developed for the COUNTY and each co-appli antt Dosed on these model pcojec and
qualiteave lodgements, the overall effectiveness of the management program will be evaluated.
TASK VI~B FISCAL ANALYSIS
Based upon the costs estimated from the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program
description (Falk VIfi), the ENGINEER wd1 prepare a of the ovemll asexl
requirements of the Part 2 M'D65 M54 permit application. The fiNGM£52 will consider
sang programs, new oe enhanmd programs and monitoring casts. A table of current and
future costs will be prepared showing estimated costs fox the dn[adon of the Symar perrrac
TASK VI-9 PREPARE AAItT 2 PERMIT APPLICATION
The ENGEJEER will produce the Put 2 permit applleatlon from the products of Tnsks Vl-1
dvough VI-8:
• Demonstration of adequate legal anMOrity (task V[-1)
• Update of Pazt l source identlfimaon (Task VI-2)
• Storm event water quality monitoring program for representnfive major outfells (Teak
VI-3)
• Fstfmxte of annual pollution loadings from outfnlla in COUNTY (Teak Vl~n)
• Design of mntinuingwaeer quxliry morvtorfng pmgeam for term of NPDES permit (Task
VI-S)
• Compcelteaslve Srormwafer Management Program (Task Vli)
• Assessment of the Management Program effectiveness (Task VI-'7)
• Flsal analysis (Task VI-8)
The written material maps, and databases for these tasks will be prepared in formats that will
be suitable For inclusion (n the Part 2 submitel.
Drafts of the Part 2 permit application and all associated documents will be subnitted Po the
COUMY and coapplicnnts fora 3o~day review period prior [o the submittal to RPA. A copy
of the permit application will be provided to the COUMY and each co-applicant.
The ENGMEER will meet once with the staff and management of the COUNTY and each co-
applicant co discwss the comments on, end the Implications of, the draft Parf 2 permit
~arwo
application. The ENGINEER will also make a presentation to each of the COUNTY and co-
appllcant's elected officiaLS on the Pnrt 2 application, if requested.
The Paet 2 application will be finalised based upon the GGUNTY's and co~applicants' review
and two copies will be submitted to EPA. She COUNTY and each en-epplicont will
rece~v¢ a copy of tha Hnal subnvnel.
TASK VII RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
The ENGINEER will respond [o EPAS request for additional iNormation. The ENGINEER will
also review the drafes of the NPDES M54 permit for the co-applicants and provide written
o the COUNTY and co-applicants [(necessary, the ENGINEER will meet with EPA
to discuss comments on the permit application.
TASK V)1I REVIEW OF DRAFT PERMIT
TTe C[JGINrEER will revimv the preliminary draft permit provided from EPA to the COUNTY
and co-epptianrs and provide suggested responsesln a letter ro tlve COUNTY and co~npplicants.
The 6NGINEER will consider in the mvlew Issues related fo costs, implemenmtion, sampling,
and additional programs. Based upon COUNtt and co-applicant comments on the suggested
responses, the ENGIIJEER will daft z letter for the COUNTY"s signature to CPA.
The &~rGINEER will also review Phe fln~l drak permit for the COUMY and ro-applicants fo
check whether or not the suggested responses were included In the final drat[ Based upon this
w, the ENGINEER will meet with CO[1MY and co-applfcant staff fo discuss the final daft
perrmt.
The ENGINEER will pecform the services associated with tlvs task for the Florida Uepartmeof
of Tansportadon iE requesful in writing from Nre COUNTY. The fees associated with these
additonal services have not been included in IXHIBIT D.
m~/wa
ExftlEFr G
Tasks SNRMWATEII NPOES P
SUMMARY OF OELIV
Dec<n~ ERMIT APPLICATION -PART 2
FRA6LE5 FROM ENGINEER
p-y„livgxa~,g
V Coordination/Liaison 12 MOn[tily meetings with co-applicants
Meeting with LPA
V[-1 Adequate Legal Authority Meeting with Attorneys fg New Ordinances
VI-2 Update Source ID Update Maps with New put(aEs
Update AutoCAD Coverage of Outfalis
V[3 Wet Weather Sampling Obtain Sampling Equipment and Aurosamplers
Sehtp Autoszmplers
Sturm Event Sampling and Analysis
V[-3.1 Torel Loads Tables o(Mmricipal-wide Pollutant Loads
VId.2 Schedule for Outfali Loads Schedule for Pollutant Loads for OutfaEs
l
VIS Continuous Monitoring Design of Long-term Morvtaring Program
Program
V16 Compreheruive Uexripeion of Management L>rogram
Management Plan Estimated Costs
V[-'J Program E(fecttveness Estimates of Comprehensive Program
Effecnveneae
VI-8 Fiscal Analysis Estimat¢ of Syear Costs
VI-9 Preparation of Permit Draft and Final Parf 2 Permit Application
Application Meetings with rtaff and elected officials
VR Response to Comments Response to EPA Commenrs on Application
Meeting wiM EPA
Vlll IZeviera of PeflNt' Response Po preliminary draft permit
rzeviiw of Fl:ml drafe permit
i i ~
BIT D-2
(COilt inved)
exxm.T o-s
_ __
___