Loading...
Ordinance 496ozn1NA?mE ND. ase .~ AN ' OF ?NE CITY OF LONGIV00D, FLORIDA \INA?.'E NO. 143, BEING TfiE ~NSI VF -' SNG ORDINANCE GF TNF CITY OP I.UN4'i ~U, C- CE N0. and OR^TNANCE N0. ?61, :,: THE I OP '. "ISR '=NT THAT A NON-CONFC L OP 1'. 'IUS; hE IN sEPARATE P ANn NOT )NTINUOUS FRONTAGE IVf 0 LR LOTS 1' SAl16 01"rNE RS1ISP, PROVIDING F~rc f:FFF,CTI4't ~ REPEAL OF ALL ORDINAN~F.S JFLLCT HL_' ,, I'AHEREAS, Ordinance No. 143 of the City of Lo ng~aoo d, Section graph 2 NO?1-CON FOR?~IING LOTS OF RE COIi- states as follows: NON-CONPORTiING LOTS OF P.ECORU- In any district which sin g].e-family dwellings a mitte d, n - withstanding liu itati.ons imposed byeo th er p ons of this ord.i.~ Ingle-{am fly d\aellingrancitr ustpmary a oryaf, uil dinos may be e tad o any single lotso£ r ord a the effective da teuo£ adoption o endment of this or di nance. Such let t fie rate o xsh ip and n of c ous Cron to gatwithpother lots in the same o\annro'tpnu and, Iv HE REAS, Ordinan cos No. I.oB and 229 contnanod srmiler visions con cernanG non-conform i.ng lots of record \ai th the exception that the Co ll owing sentence was deleted: "Such lot must be in separate ownership and not of con to nuous frontage with other lots rn the same ownership", and IY f1E REAS, the City of l,nngrvood desires to establish uniform crrterra For building ~p .such non-conform ing 1o'es of reco and ~ I\ddERE AS, the. City of Longwood, Florida states that it 15 the Policy of the City o£ Longw~oo d, Florida that the language used \n Section 4, paragraph 2 p{ Ordinanc¢ No. 14i as quoted above repre- sents the policy of the City of Lon g\eood, Florida pertaining to non- conforming lots of record, requiring that a s. ngle family dwelling and customary accessory bnd lding may be erected on rv gle lot of record at the effective date of adonxion or amendment of Ordinance No. 10.3, ant such lot must be in separate ownership and not. of continuous frontage rvi th other lots in the semo ownership; No!V, THEREFORE, 116 IT oRDA INF.D 9Y THE CITY COAPIISSIGN OF THE CITY OF LONGIVOOD, FLORI-A: SECTIDN 1: That Ordinance No. 143 as amended and supplemented, said Ordinance being the co mprehensave zoning ord finance of the Ci Yy of Longwood, is hereby omen dad as £o 11 ows: NON-CONFORbIING SOTS OF RP.COR-. In any district in which single family dwellings are permitted, no twithst xnding limitations ,. sad by otherp vasaons of [his ordinance, a single family dwelling and customary accessary buildings may be erected on any single lot of record at the effective date of adoption or amendment of Ordinance No. 143 of the City o£ Longwood. Such lot must be in rate o.. nersh iP and not of contan uo us frontage with other lots in the same owne rshiP. This provision shall apply even though such lot fei l.s to meet the requ.iromonts fox area or width, or both, that ere gene re lly applicable in the dis xri ct, Prov idod that yard d.imen- saons and other requirem©nts not anvol ving area or width, or both, of lot shall conio rm to the ro gulations for rho di.s trice in inhich such lot is loce tad. Vnri an ce of ai jai dth, and yard roquir¢mants shall be obtained only through action of the Board of Adjustment. If tiro or more lots or combinations o£ lots and Portions of lots ivi th continuous £ro ntage an single ownership arc of record at the tame o£ passage or amendment of this ordi nonce, and if all or t of the loci do not meet the requirements for loY iai dth and area as established by this ordinance, the lends involved shall be consid- ered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this ordinance, and n iron o£ said parcel shall be used or sold which does not meet lot width and area requirements established by this ordinance, nor shall any division of the parcel be made which Leaves remazning any lot with width or area bel m~ the requirements stated in xhis ordinance. SF.CTtON 2 A11 ordi non cos ar zes oluilons in conflict with this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed. .. o. s<, d'C~,. /~id0 n, /