LPAMin11-09-94CANNING AGENCY
Dogwood, Florida
November 9, 1996
AMENDED
RESENT:
, NAIRMAN SohnFH ock, DIRECTOR
A jmal J , CITY PLANNER
AI CANAADEHllLLINGTON Terri Mor , SECRETARY
ABSENT: OEHTS:
John Simpson Anderson
Aaron Gorovitz
The meeting was called Yo order at 1:04p.m. by Chai
2. PROVAL 0 made by M vels ands ondetl
by M HullingtonMtN approve them notes of O tober 1Re 1994 as amentled.
TRe motion carried by a unanrmous voice vote.
3. Hildmere, Hlock 1, Lots 1 -) and Lots 20 - 26 Rezoning from
Ri-A to R-3.
fated that a ording to the CompreRensive Plan, the land u
designation o the subject property is Medium D ity R sidential. The
Comprehensive Plan s that there c n be multiple z ings a signed t
that property, whichaa e R-2 and R-3. TRe major differences being
density between R-2 and A-3 and the setback requirements.
The o requesting R-3 t ing, which would be i ompliance with
the Comprehensive Plan, in order to build single family homes on the
property.
Anderson, representing the o stated that they w
build 1 Ingle Family homes o lots. Anderson also
tated tRat they would probably u a natural buffer to set tRe lots of£
E nom the surrounding properties.
. Kathy Swaggerty, 2 Tullis A expressed s about
this property being developed. Shens ted that tReresi Dal neatly s
flooding when i and showed s etpictures t the H artl con£irminq
this fact. Ehera ted that them undingo grope rty
ned that with sa w development going i there will be oadd tional
runof £, and therefore,tef Tootling tReir property more than at present.
She furtRer s ted TRat Seminole County i orking o ing the
problem of runoff feom the canal and retentron pond wheno the nano.. are
Mr. Jami c tetl that when the plat i submitted for r ould
be r by all departments antl that if there i any vproblem wwith
poxential ed noff generated by this development, ould be
addressed a athat t Corrections would then be made to the plans in
order to avert this1 problem.
Land Planning Agency
vember 9, 1994
Page 2
This project will be r - traduced when they are ready to subdivide and
submit plans £or review and approval.
made by Mr. Revels to appro the r ning for
Wildmere, Lots 1 - and Lots 20 - 26 from R o R-3 and was seconded
by Mr. eullington. cThe voice vote was unanimous.
4. INTOMM P LONGWOOO HILL6 ROAD/CARE EMMA ROAD - REZONING
FROM C-Z RO RT1 (PARCELS 16 II).
ted that this project w s being presented i order to
formalize the for the City Commission to consitler the
rezoning on thie Ppropertyz.
. Aaron G onf rimed with [he LPA that this was presented before
Eor an Administrative Rezoning.
Chairman Meltzer asketl if there was anyone present to speak against the
rezoning.
Steve Holgate, vel Court, expressed c about the
ing. Hew red to know what the tli ££erence in rhea rezoning meant
and what it would mean to the neighborhootl.
explained t Holgate the dif£eience between C-2 and R-1 and
thatain the R-i zoning, Ingle family residences are allowed.
xt w also eapl ained t Holgate that the applicant i requesting a
Administrative R ing in order to bring the toning in compliance with
the comprehensivez Plan
4064 sty ing Place, selberry, appearetl
iepre ing Ted Takvo iron iwho o nthe c r lotas red that M
Takvorian asked him to attend the nmeeting and £ind o ctly what w
being done and if anything w s happening to his property. red
that M Takvorian has been approached by a retail company toH purchase
his property antl that hew red to know haw he w s to proceed. He also
wanted to know if the City hatl any vision for his property.
ock explained t by the Florida s the
Adopted Land O e Plart takes Lprecedence to the c ings The
Adopted Land H Plan £or this e ncl utling M t. Takvorian's
property, ity R siden[iala e Brock s red that
Takvorian w aeletter explaining what w s being requested o the
subject property t the letter, also s red that he could
pursue s milar alter ative z ing, whichwwould be anything that would be
ompliance w the comprehensive plan, Low Density Residential,
which is R-1 or R-lA.
Mi. Latimer asketl what could be done with 60,000 square feet i the R-1
ing. Mr. Jami explained that the property could be subdivided, which
would mean i - s unrts per acre.
explained that i£ M Takvoiian w ted t the property £or
ial, he would neetl to petition the LYA t end the Comprehensive
Planet show c ial o the particular property. This board would
make endation wrticrt would be forwarded t the city c
who woulemake the Einal decision o whether to amend the Comprehensive
Plan to c ial for the giv n property. ZE the City Commission makes
endation t end the eCOmprehensive Plan, which i n do only
twice a year, r ould then go t the s ate Department tof aCOmmunity
A££airs in Tallahassee for their review.
Trte B and expressetl that it wasn t making an official recommendation,
just noting options.
Mr. Sarni ted that if the City w s to do a Administrative Rezoning
which thescity i required to do i the Future, the subject property
o uld be i zonetl to Residential in older to comply witR the Adopted Land
Use Plan. e
ock s ted that w the verge of bringing r sed land
development tiegulations toa the City Commission £or their er and
sideration. The n tep o the pl anving pro whichew
little behintl sadministratively slarge umbe[eof
parcels i the City ri order to bring the e ing z ing regulations
and ing map ompliance with the Comprehe live Plan. Mi.
Takvorian's parcee would be one of the parcels to be so considered.
A motion w made by M Revels t approve the requested r ing from
- - cell I and 2I, and seconded by Mr. eullington zOThe vorce
5. INTOMM PROPERTY - LONGWOOO NILLB ROAD/LAEE EMM ROAD - REZONING
. Jami stated that this was already zonetl Residential, just going to
a higher tlensity.
made by M Bullington t end the r ing of 2
Parcel II-Future from R-lA to R-1 and was seconded by eMr. Revels.ntThe
ock s tetl that hew ted to bring the B and up-to-date by saying
that the City Commission has had four m ings, which included three
specral m ings and o regular m ing a agenda item, talk
about proposed improvements to Rangeli ne Road.anThe re has been a great
ana el anninq Agency
vember 9, 1994
gage a
deal of public i and input o this project. The City Commission
last ondaynt ing's eting sidered their positron
angeline M oad, andn they have formally ted and adopted
impro tR plan £or the immediate wfuture. TRe ov improvements
ncludemedrainage improvements, nstallation of sidewalks and road
impro ents. The only change they made from the Commission's pre
position w s for that portion from Chuzch Avenue to sA 4 o haveua
12-£oot median and no sidewalk on the western side in theavrcr ni ty of
The Commission had also asked that ta££ look ending the
Comprehensive Plan reflect future three ntfouz laning of
angeline Road. The Comprehensive Plan has n ncluded foul laning
all o£ Rangeline Road, Rowever, it does calls for three laning the
portion o£ Rangeline Road n rth s£ ChurcR A also calls
for three laning the portion of Rangeline Roades uth 9of CRUrch A
down to S.R. 43a r antl rt £urther specifies four laning ethe
portion of Rangeline RoatlS between Church Avenue and S.R. 434 in 2005.
ock explained that i£ the B and r ends t the City C
that the comprehensive Plan be a ended s o delete any refe ence t
fut three r £our laning o£ ftangelines Road, there maybe two
alternative ways to go about i ould amend the applicable pieces
of the Comprehensive Plan referenced i the B ard's handouts t imply
take out those references t three andnfour laning and change the t
ordingly. uch a endment woultl then obviously be sent to the State
for their revrew andmapproval/disapproval.
when the Department of nity Affairs looks this ort of
omprehensive Plan amendment they will i all likelihood look a it
from regional perspec Theyn will Look the
tudies/plans that have been donee £or tRe s unding geographicalra
older taln whether this is a more viable solution than was
previously proposed.
The sugges made t if w ould c ordinate o efforts with
tron was o see e c o ur
the Department o£ T nsportation and their f-4 Corridor study t try t
{urther enhance the possibility of another interchange on I-4 obetween
s. R. 434 and Lake Mary Boulevard.
rallel a ould be for staff t ork with the Orlando llrban
Area T nsportation Study (MPO) staff to look a any other alternatives
available to guide through traffic along other iroutes.
The City's staff will also need t ork £urther with Seminole C unty and
the City of Lake Mary with their t nsportation plan elements.
orking with the v s planning agencies that c affected by
this amendment, it wi lluenable u o look for ways t Ialleviate tra££ic
problems and allow u submit a potentially more acceptable proposed
amendment to the State.
Land elanning Agency
vember 9, 1999
Page 5
ock indicated that by including all of these a
tegral part of any proposed plan amendment, willc showt tRe State
that efforts a e being made to develop feasible alternatives t three
and four laving Rangeline Road a way o£ handling projectetl through
ra£fic volumes. At the s the proposed amendment should
emphasize the City's adoptetl commitment to preserving the integrity of
the City's establisRed residential neighborhoods.
Jerry Connel, Devonshire, tetl t the ¢ and that the 5 nabling
act that started this a 19'l3o aid that all rage,e pow
transportation, all the tilities and raff is she uldw be tlone
regional basis and st atedu that he agreed with the s thatn r
should be backed up with a regional effort. nel tivdi at ed tRat
ould get by, but if you get s mebody revrewing nthe amendment that
knows what he's doing, it won't get by.
There w a lengthy tliscussion c ivg the proposed amendment and
what a enue that the City should take to submit the proposal to the
motion w made by M ¢ullington t end the Comprehensive Plan i
o zder to persevere the i tegrity o£ the r siderttial a of the City
and a the s e time, provide for traffic c col atien needs as discussed
by Mr. ezockm This was seconded by Mr. Revels. The vorce vote was
this point, Mr. Meltzer welcomed the new commissioner Mi. ei 11
wrnston to the meeting.
o have the n eeting on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. The
artl w cel the n eeting, which would be
November 523 na1999 sand have the next meeting on December 14, 1994.
¢. Atlj ~~rn: made by M Bullington t adjourn the
ing antl was seconded by Mr. Revels. The meeting was adjourned at
Be25pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Perrr Mor ec retary