The URL can be used to link to this page

24-1674 Adopt the Vision Zero Action Plan RESOLUTION NO. 24-1674 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA,APPROVING THE CITY OF LONGWOOD'S VISION ZERO GOAL TO ELIMINATE TRAFFIC DEATHS AND SEVERE INJURIES ON THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, AND ADOPT THE VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Longwood acknowledges deadly and severe crashes are not inevitable, and death and severe injury are not an acceptable cost for using our public roadway system; and WHEREAS, human life and health are paramount and should take priority over mobility and other objectives of the transportation system; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood recognizes roadways have historically been designed to prioritize vehicle throughput at high speeds and there is a need for change to reduce the speed of vehicles to prevent the detriment of health and safety; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood understands that vehicle speeds and lack of safe facilities for people walking and biking have been identified as major causes of traffic deaths; and WHEREAS, motorcyclists, pedestrians, and bicyclists are the most vulnerable road users and account for 7 pedestrian, 1 bicycle, and 1 motorcyclist crashes of all traffic deaths and severe injuries in Longwood between 2018-2022. Additionally, these vulnerable users account 7 out of 9 fatalities over the same period; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood will continue to take measures to make streets safer for all road users, as the city has previously with its complete street policy, particularly those who are most physically vulnerable, such as seniors, youth and people with disabilities, and will further encourage of all ages and abilities to walk, bike and take transit; and WHEREAS, that City of Longwood recognizes that communities of color, low-income communities, youth and seniors are all disproportionately impacted by traffic fatalities; and WHEREAS, Longwood recognizes that over 80% of fatal and serious injury crashes within the city limits of Longwood occur on roads maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation or Seminole County and eliminating serious injury crashes will require significant collaboration with those agencies; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Transportation has adopted the Safe System approach; and Resolution No.24-1674 Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation has adopted a Target Zero Initiative; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood will implement Vision Zero's data-driven strategy to eliminate all traffic deaths and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood will implement USDOT's Safe System approach that recognizes that people will make mistakes and roadway systems and policies should be designed to protect them through redundancies and shared responsibilities; and WHEREAS, Vision Zero jurisdictions are implemented across Seminole County Florida, which is expected to increase regional efforts significantly in the coming years; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA,that: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. ADOPTION. The City Commission hereby adopts the Vision Zero goal to eliminate traffic deaths and severe injuries by 2035 on all City-owned streets and by 2045 on all other streets and roads within the city. The City Commission of the City of Longwood will adopt the 2024 Vision Zero Action Plan. SECTION 3. WORKING GROUP. A multi-disciplinary Vision Zero Working Group will be formed to advise the City of Longwood on the development and implementation of a Vision Zero Action Plan and shall be comprised of organizations and agencies with expertise in transportation, education, public health, emergency response, equity, transit, biking, and walking. SECTION 4. CONFLICTS: All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict with any of the provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed. SECTION 5.SEVERABILITY: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Commission that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this Resolution are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Resolution shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Resolution. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall take effect upon final passage and adoption. Resolution No.24-1674 Page 2 of 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024. CITY COMMISSION CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 44114(941/ \ MATTHEW MCMILLAN, MA OR ATTES : HELLE MC, FCRM, CITY CLERK Appr s form and legality for the use and reliance of the City of Longwood, Florida, only. c/ DANIEL W. LA d;( ORNEY Resolution No.24-1674 Page 3 of 3 . - 111\006.416% j,..,._ 111% 'IN 4 ' • 4. " ..,_. , •- ,. H , ,. VISION ZERO . . . . . 4 ir CENTRAL FLORIDA V / TOp '4.fttg . .0110■ ..,7 -4:..,..r. -. .:",• - Avoili 0 I 0 k _a , - — , . . . .:• ,T1 , ma, ._4-./ 4. -, •, ' ! '- . • ' .. . '', 4. i , . . - ) * MID' • ' ...i.v. . ----I.._ ' ,...• ------..:„.', . . ._...-- Vision Zero ACTION PLAN LONG WOOD illit . ... • ..„.• ..,„ •.:.Q:, ..... IA NGW()()1) metrop,an or'anda ...,-........ ..... .. .11111°- 2024 ..... .0„.. . • 4 _..,_ git* • , . . .. .. .1 . •19/. le :•4., A.,1 .... I _. a I 4:: '• . A. g..... . , f. "4' • • . . , •,• • . a J.. . ,,L,_ : 1,1 il i-I I-.. ,Aar 1;111111111I IV.-.e..ii • nallignii 1 ..' . • .........••••• ' I Ili 1,•11 •• ••• ,;•1 il t:'- ... - •• ••••"1-iitt!!! . .-. •%I 1%.• • 411 . - ..'-•--;"„r:1., - _ . -...... --.......—— — - f•,,, ,,-.. (-:-'-'''-::..:.---, . - ..r...... . . ,. . :. ... ..,..— - ......-- • .•..-+.-......,-...-. Mil. . _......1".'"-... ....,.: _'...:..-, 4111N9PW 2'- 7,- ,---.....)..‘.-,.....- , Executive Summary Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic deaths and serious injuries while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all. The City of Longwood Safety Action Plan was developed from a coordinated planning effort led by MetroPlan Orlando, in partnership with Seminole County, local governments and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). This Action Plan is one of 23 total plans, including one regional plan, three county plans, and 19 municipal plans. As a region (Orange, Osceola, and Achieving zero traffic deaths and serious Seminole counties), more than 5 people injuries is an ambitious goal, requiring a are killed and 35 people are seriously cultural change and a shift in how we injured on our roadways every week - a plan, operate, and use our transportation higher rate than elsewhere in Florida and system. It represents a shared responsibility the nation. Thirty percent of people killed among all stakeholders including all road on our roadways are walking or biking. users, decision makers, agency staff, law These aren't just numbers, but represent enforcement, and vehicle manufacturers. people in our communities: co-workers, neighbors, visitors, friends, and family This plan is grounded in the Safe System members. Each of these deaths and Approach which aims to eliminate deadly serious injuries leaves our community with and serious injury crashes on our roads pain and loss. by anticipating human mistakes and minimizing impacts on the human body when crashes do occur. Ever week 5 The City seeks to y eliminate deaths people die and 35 are serio usl •h and serious injuries y on City roads by injured in Central 20 Florida crashes. 35 and all other roads by 2050. e , . r, -6 r k, . N: w \ •77.L"' 4' S"e OM `rs� I'a dig.. O , •• � k, a-I;......, . + , . .. , • • .`,s,.,.•, ty-' _4_ Executive Summary 13 __ _ .r,' What Is Vision Zero Central Florida & Why Do We Need to Take Action? Saving lives. That's what it's all about. The only acceptable number for traffic deaths is zero, because everyone deserves to travel safely around Central Florida. No one entity or agency can fix road safety problems alone. This Vision Zero Central Florida Safety Action Plan results from a coordinated planning effort led by MetroPlan Orlando, in partnership with local governments and the Florida Department of Transportation. We're the only place in the nation where a regional organization worked alongside every single county and city government in the area to coordinate safety planning on this scale. Action plans tailored for each county and city have identified opportunities to change roadway designs, educational needs, and enforcement strategies. The plans include: SANFORD APOPKA LAKE MARY Seminole • High Injury Network: Identifying places on LONGWOOD ALTAMONTE WINTER SPRINGS the transportation system with the highest SPRINGS OVIEDO CASSELBERRY risk of deadly and serious injury crashes EATONVILLE so we can focus on our most important OCOEE MAITLAND OAKLAND WINTERERPARKPARK Orange problem areas. WINTER ORLANDO • Equity: Identifying and prioritizing efforts GARDEN EDGEWOOD WINDERMERE in disadvantaged communities that are BELLE ISLE disproportionately affected by traffic crashes. • List of Priority Streets and Intersections: KISSIMMEE Osceola Producing a list of feasible projects that sT.c have the most safety impact. • Educational and Enforcement Programs: Identifying key behavioral changes needed to reduce crashes and methods for encouraging those changes. • Sustained Effort: Establishing a defined process and responsibilities for carrying out, updating, and monitoring progress. • Outreach Events: Public engagement is a key part of the study. mimmenmsis 3-COUNTY REGION (2018-2022) 325 77 crashes ,466 deaths 9,500 juries Reason For Concern In Longwood LONGWOOD (2018-2022) Nearly 17,000 people call Longwood people were killed home. The community chooses Longwood on our roadways, for its plentiful recreational opportunities, including: school choices, rich history, and an enjoyable pace of living. €11 motorist A. Unfortunately, nine people lost their lives deaths in Longwood over the five year period 6 pedestrian from 2018 to 2022. People who walk, bike, deaths and ride motorcycles are at greatest risk. 18kmotorcyclist Of the nine deaths, 66% of them were deaths pedestrians. O�O O bicyclist deaths Time of day is a major factor. The hours of 3 PM to 6 PM have the highest number of deadly or serious traffic crashes for motor vehicles, while 6 PM to 9PM have City of Longwood the highest number of deadly or serious Mission Statement: crashes for vulnerable users. The most common deadly or serious injury crashes "To foster citizen trust are pedestrian related, followed by rear end crashes. by practicing open, accountable, and The road to zero is long, but the City of responsive government; Longwood is positioned to make progress. providing quality core The countywide trend in traffic deaths services; promoting and serious injury crashes is in a slight downtrend. Deadly and serious injury long-term prosperity; crashes occurred 17 times in 2018. Five encouraging smart growth years later in 2022, they occurred 6 times. in harmony with the City's That's a reduction of 65%. There is more unique heritage and urban work to be done. This plan outlines steps to surroundings; strengthening get there. the City's standing as a preeminent destination for commercial endeavors; and promoting livability by enhancing and protecting our neighborhoods." Executive Summary 5 DEADLY AND SERIOUS INJURY CRASHES (2018-2022) if F - ce 0 , E Ei / f 0(1)I f. a_l li Longwood Hills Rd 6•---°0—Q,--! '-' ---4'''" i (3 4.- Cbur i 0 Ai ye, LON e / t/ 01 - - „--) -1- -' ..._ Tcy .c-.- _47...4...y.\_ arrena Ave - . CI0 )CE ar .)-.!7—( if4 -.\. 1 •E 0 >. 0 a_ L 73 ._ o 6 . LT_ ,,,•- • so c: Ilo 1 , / L....._ F ALTAMO TE r-L........—, SPRING II '• ...„---i----. II I Source:Signal 4 Analytics, 2018-2022:excludes limited access facilities. N 0 ti:. .'i Fr •'' Mile: • / • • J • wits 1.---1. / "'Nr50.„_-0 .o 'El i I / �3 0 ' 0 a (1) w J n • O D 0 c O O 0 0,1 GWOOD a `• Deadly and Serious Injury Crashes by Year • 18 • . 0 0 • f� �; '0 16 ite o E Church Ave o 0 1 N 14 `1 • '� • 12 • . _4_ - 10 1 ., CP( J QT.5) ©(2/D H.• U II ok �ii C) 6 I I I I I I I O .f D A o .03 z 4 m_ 00 2 I I I a • :i 3 2 2 2 cp as n1 CI 0 �. o ._ 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 -6 v. Serious Injury Year (zipV.• Deadly • �• Dog Track Rd •— CA : Kth Y y •) • • \ 4• Deadly Crashes I Serious InjuryCrashes t x Executive Summary 17 Key Highlights and Recommendations from This Plan Actions Outcome The list of actions in this plan are organized Completing the actions in this plan is more around the Safe System approach. than a check mark. It is tangible action to Infrastructure alone cannot solve the traffic touch the lives of our community. It can safety crisis. It will take a combination of translate into less pain and suffering from enhancement to our roads, travel speeds, traffic deaths. Fewer parents worrying as their road users, vehicles, and post-crash children become drivers. Fewer funerals for care. Each of the actions in this plan has our loved ones. This plan is a major milestone a performance measure, a target year in shifting our transportation system to a safer for initiation, a responsible party within system. Together we start our quest to zero county departments, and a relative cost. traffic deaths. Together we drive to zero. Some actions can be done right away. Some have longer lead times to account for coordination, funding, and strategic Relationship to Other City planning. Tracking progress on each of the actions is critical for evaluating and refining Efforts strategies over time. A separate section of This Vision Zero Action plan is meant to actions is dedicated to future progress. It complement the city's current plans and includes strategies such as updating this initiatives. A few key plans include: action plan every five years. • Longwood Development Code (LDC) - Projects Establishes technical standards, procedures, and requirements for land Additionally, a list of priority projects was and real estate development. identified to strengthen the safety on • Comprehensive Plan - Establishes the our roads. There is 1 priority project on goals, objectives, and policies that are City roads and 8 prioritized projects on promoted through the LDC. County and State roads. Each project • Complete Streets Policy Integrates includes recommendations for engineering people and place into all phases of transportation. Adopted in 2015. countermeasures, such as roadway lighting. • Mobility Plan and Fee - Integrates land Network-wide projects, ones that can be done before, during, or after roadway use and transportation imporvements for specific projects are included as well. These all users. Adopted in August 2024. • network-wide projects address crash factors Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan - such as speeding. Project implementation Encompasses existing facilities and new will require a coordinated effort between the project needs. This Plan is currently being updated. City, Seminole County, and the State. Longwood Action Plan Summary • Pilot Quick Build Projects with • Coordinate with FDOT and the Traffic Calming Countermeasures County on Projects �A\ • Establish / Adopt Multimodal • Support Segment Lighting Project Crossing Design Preferences on SR 434 SAFER ROADS • Include Safety Countermeasures • Coordinate Safety Improvements in Development Agreements with Utility Projects "<‘ • Install Speed Feedback Signs • Evaluate Feasibility of Deploying • Support Lowest Target Speed for "Twenty is Plenty" Speed Limit SR 434, Ronald Reagan Blvd, and Strategy US 17-92 SAFER SPEEDS • Partner with Motorcycle Safety • Launch Vision Zero Public •� Organizations Campaign •orb 410 • Conduct High Visibility • Coordinate Traffic Safety Enforcement Operation/ Presentations with Schools SAFER ROAD USERS Educational Traffic Stop Program • Collaborate with Professional • Publicize the Availability of the Organizations Furthering Safe "SAFERCAR" Phone Application Vehicle Requirements for Recall Notifications • Consider Emerging Vehicle Safety Systems when Purchasing SAFER VEHICLES New Fleet Vehicles -�- • Meet with First Responders • Promote CPR / Emergency First Regularly Aid Training POST CRASH CARE • Develop Vision Zero Status Report • Create / Assign a Dedicated • Formalize Vision Zero Working Transportation Safety Staff Group Position for Safety Planner or CONTINUING • Update Action Plan Every 5-Years Engineer PROGRESS Executive Summary 19 Acknowledgements City of Longwood Working Group Shad Smith, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Eric W. Nagowski, Public Works Engineer Anjum Mukherjee, Senior Planner Michael Peters, Fire Chief Troy Feist, Deputy Chief Jared Roberson, Fire Marshall Sgt. James Finch, Traffic Sergeant Matt Hockenberry, Streets and Stormwater Division Manager Summer Raines, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyst MetroPlan Orlando Lara Bouck, Project Manager Slade Downs, Deputy Project Manager Mighk Wilson, Regional Project Manager Adriana Rodriguez, Program Manager Mary Ann Horne, Communications Lead Cynthia Lambert, Public Information Manager Taylor Laurent, Manager of Transportation Planning Alex Trauger, Principal / Director of Transportation Planning Consultant Project Team (HDR) Megan Ferguson, Project Manager Jeff Arms, Project Principal Melissa Porcaro, Deputy Project Manager Sean Murphy Cheryl Isenberg Laura Agudelo Tyler Swofford Hannah Weary Anna Perry Taylor Belinger • Preparation of this plan was funded by a $3.79 million Safe Streets and Roads for All federal grant awarded to MetroPlan Orlando Statement of Protection of Data from Discovery and Admissions SECTION 148 OF TITLE 23, UNITED STATES CODE REPORTS DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION — Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at the location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data. Executive Summary 11 CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Guiding Principles & Safe Systems Approach 14 Talking to Our Community 18 • Focusing on Our Users 26 Getting to Zero 42 Action Plan 50 Vision Zero Resolution 74 •:.. t4 0 I MN", -''j r 1 1 I - . . - - 1. 4.•• . r .. ... •i•t , 4'v 4-.'e--.1.rr•.:1)#'..**.r't--1-.'...'o!1 1ti4..•..1-.4..... .T., ..,•••'•. '•I..'-'-!4•y,•':-o.#.!1'••'.''4,..f.!1...,._,".•.•.•r ..-•' :-• • , • it*. f0r..".1f.•'•1 ,•.‘!.4...... 1 . • . • . . • . < )"'(t•4 . . . a .-.-*. •; ''.. •.L.• . ::• .1" •- . ..t. N 4.-•!..,.. .:*.i". ,t. • • . •r• • ....i. • .......- .;=0:1 ./•*::. :' • -.:•., . • ii‘4,-A., - ... -.4, . .- . -3.,,,, ,....tr n ' .6.4,.:,. .,4 /•';''1. ' .1.'-ilf5r4..-4,#• / 5tviim . u...A."' Irootil056 . „ e ',6*1'..f7. ‘;t'-36%6%. . / -• ' '• •.71 '' . " . .. . . .• . r .-..... ' •Jp.?'t'l*Ow.4.4( •.' '...,,• ' .. _ 4, ., . ...4.4_,..,' , ...z•-•,\,.• 0 .• • ' • .; ' le 't , .'.. : ,s ..t I• . f'''' •:'1_,'" . r:• . . . ' ...V. A.. .^, • _.*,Fi I't° • •• - _ --•40 •..... . . . . • ... r , e! • *ill' • ''' •-"t". - ...,. • ,&:i..•• ef...$. ..e , ... ,,,.. . , A• •'ais ar 1 . , • • OP. . 4' •,..:.C.-, '' -ir. • ,... , ,\,,......,4.,... ,........-- . - `i. • ...t" . . .. I. t • . . c •••••••*.,-.4i • . ' • .'e. • • ,,,,k - . .....-r. • . o ...: ...•• _ . •5'• '.,../• g;' ' • ' '-'''Si.' .4' "7 1 .;•• ' "" '. , a r • .1 ' • 7 „-..1,' • ..., ...- . .. ..„, .,,,q•-, 4 „Agit . It• - • •. „ . , _, . '..c-'...' • . _.... . ...- - • • • er 1 * • fit - , ille.:',I. , •r • . • --16.J , .,,,,..." ., •, ..._ —..c. .. , , .. , . ,.,‘...z. ..... .•-4,. , , . , .. . 416, 111111r. 4 I* ,. . . , A A .. . . I 4. . ...-. • • , ,t• . . .. . .......-. --.• , . . . . - s i .1-""•iz.• 4- • _, . ....„ •--.- p.-‘•.:„,e. --.. ...k . , ,.. ,:,....„- • , ifi .. • -i t'4..' ' 4.:,...,:,....'--*: .•. .. '' A ; 4, ,---- \r• • , t?•-• • - -..— • •• • , '. — -.4. . . •ilki, -a%,....,.. . ,:. '... - . • :.49 . 4 .,. • ,.... ..-. e•-. L--- 4v,N.--,.,... . .....- ,„. .„.. -, .. . . • .. . . .., ...'`•., -..•-• r . : • - ..... - . . i ,• -....,. • :r re , 0, • i *- . }.. ' ...• • • 4" s- 1 . •• • , . t',,' :, ' - • Of• I 'd - or - *I.° • •4. sar•, I: .•'• '...„...A A.., rear, ".:.,`, . !' t ! "% !,-;.s_ •::.• !.'4..t4r ''' •'06 - ... . -.4646.0.--"' .....•- - .4,or ' A ' "1-, ,1._'• ' , ..V.,::,.....; .% h. .41 it '. '- :- .;;-::. 'P'14.. ' - ...-1 •• el. ,•'-'411e , . • ........ , 4,- .1, .,. --.•ilv "AL 1,,.... f • ' • -•i'tt:- . - ' , .. ... , ,, ti. It IP& "I' .. -Y . ... , .• . ., :. ,';'- '15r.•'..,•,:-.. ... 110 , - • --..4.•r ..., ' 1 / . 1 ' . .4•4°*'' -,,-;• . ...Ar '-, •,,.....-i'.. • . .....,...,,J,. . ,..a.,,t_ 7 • -,..." "1.a••4 - -.',...--....•-. ..... • l• a Guiding Principles & Safe Systems Approach Vision Zero is the strategy to eliminate all traffic deaths and serious injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. , .,• . gp...11111g.- . i... _ .. -41- "IMIIIIIII............- 1..0 ..........---- ..r. '4:11 ' NyillYyr.1•4•• • . • '..•• le,A*• , dill ^ t •,.41 •••'-- 11.,... / / L ' "1"4‘r • . 1 . I . .1.:v ., .it it ti. (S fa,. -t- .„.... • i, ..., . i /1 ,0 ,a•---- .....illom•••••••-• ,.. - •......__ --- .11•11• ......, I • ... 1 \ '. \-V--- ' ! . I. t 0 .1 t I L / .. 't ':- . . ., . • . i Ikt//1 V . . . ... . :f f ..#* ,47'1141* 41141001111111a=plow• :4pen i, "*".111111111111110.1'.-' MIAOW'..-- -ACM* ....nommuovr- - •...: ti it 41 Ikelli., .- , .. ..,,,.............r................,......._.......7 , ....• r. • , - . .... 1„,,,,416, 111111 ''. •1 -• ' 4ir ) i , I . , . .. • ... • %.:'..1..•' "' .:. . •° ,,,-.._ Nt•it,. .. ....‘ . ' _ ......_. • ' •...: -414. 11.t.. W.r.:I i I-i k , .‘11"146- -"*" '.......... i- i 1 .. q.''',..e7....- - --....- sills. '. . - ' • 1.; . I,.1. ' 'r.- • i ,,•,-,.4%:,...4: i ilt'%‘.-1-. ?:•:. '0--...:" .''''''4.- ......, . - ,• • ! . . •110,1444.4..._ -. 'S' '.."111141WRII••••• ---- - .. r: ... - ‘.....,c ,... :•., t . . , r ,. „... r . 4 . I • .• 4, f•-• , .•.--- - . ., 1 11 Ir.,.-1,,.. _. ,. . • P•• I . • r . . .. . ,. •••%°. .. , . li ---- -- tNil- • ; .',I' • ., 1 li 1• . . ' 1; •• . , -._ .. . 1 : /, ,.. „ , . . ...: -... . ) ..... . , . 'I '' •'t1; \ 11P10* 1 , • P- . -• % 1 /• .. •_ - WHAT IS VISION ZERO? Vision Zero reframes traffic deaths as preventable. Vision Zero is an international movement with nearly 20 years of success around the world that is now making its way through America. It acknowledges we all make mistakes AND aims to establish a safe system through data driven decision making. Being a Vision Zero community is more Like all ambitious goals, Vision Zero than a tagline. Vision Zero communities is not without its challenges. Some must meet these minimum standards: hurdles observed in other Vision Zero • Set clear goal of eliminating traffic Communities include: deaths and severe injuries • Rapid population growth • Elected officials have committed • Availability of funding publicly to Vision Zero • Inability to gain consensus on • Data driven, equity-focused decision specific strategies and projects making • Spot improvements alone without • Actionable Strategies are developed system wide improvements • Key agency departments (including • Failing to adapt as trends and police, transportation, public health) technology changes are engaged TRADITIONAL APPROACH VISION ZERO Traffic deaths are INEVITABLE Traffic deaths are PREVENTABLE PERFECT human behavior Integrate HUMAN FAILING in approach Prevent COLLISIONS Prevent FATAL AND SEVERE CRASHES INDIVIDUAL responsibility SYSTEMS approach Saving lives is EXPENSIVE Saving lives is NOT EXPENSIVE Source:Vision Zero Network VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD SAFE SYSTEMS �P��1SER�O�SINIURYISUNgU�FPjge APPROACH .� K. o��yG The Safe System Approach 44,sis ° F s w, acknowledges safety is a THE y shared responsibility. N SAFE SYSTEM v s APPROACH „^+�,a tP N v IL ^' 41?) OJce This data-driven, holistic, and equitable 1 SOUGH method to improve roadway safety Ago 3AVS Q44, is adopted by the U.S. Department of q , OS Transportation (USDOT). It acknowledges • the vulnerability of the human body RESPO?SieluTYlssH 5 when designing and operating a transportation network to minimize serious consequences of crashes. Creating a Safe System means shifting some responsibility from road users to those THE SAFE SYSTEMS who plan and design the transportation APPROACH IS CENTERED system. While road users are responsible AROUND THE FOLLOWING: for their own behavior, there is a shared responsibility with those who design, operate, and maintain the transportation 6 SAFE SYSTEM network, including the automotive PRINCIPLES industry, law enforcement, elected • Death/Serious Injury is officials, and government agencies to Unacceptable improve safety. In a Safe System, road • Humans Make Mistakes system designers and operators take on • Humans are Vulnerable the highest level of ethical responsibility • Responsibility is Shared to design and build our transportation • Safety is Proactive system in a way that encourages safer • Redundancy is Crucial behavior and provides redundancies. SAFE SYSTEM The Safe System Approach 5 ELEMENTS acknowledges that no one entity or • Safer Road Users agency can fix road safety problems • Safer Vehicles alone. Instead, coordination, • Safer Speeds cooperation, resources, and focus from • Safer Roads other agencies within the region, the • Post-Crash Care State and Federal Governments are necessary for success. Guiding Principles & Safe Systems Approach 117 Talking to Our Community This section highlights feedback and outreach events. Vision Zero is successful when we engage everyone. Everyone is involved in transportation. Everyone has a stake: drivers, non- drivers, walkers, cyclists, motorcycle riders, bus riders, bus drivers, and beyond . t' d,' '111,1W ii."1,1;t1r; IgNmip, ,V, a4t.,q1,.. ...) is,ir i lii4k11 12 !I:P(1 1 Ntik.s,. 71114k. t. .• _,.. i '111.11N. ,-; 1 ......A. ..:... ,:11,11 , ,,,,,,,,,,,,, p...‘1,7, ,,,..,,, ,:. 1,-,.. ,„.,,,:,,,,,,,,,,„ __;.- ,,,I ..., ,,,,.. , f-no ,„,,,,„ ,,--,...,..,,,,,. 1.1 a- ,-'. -1.i z z.- .= t.1.,,-4 - It cP- , 5 , , - z'tl 1 -.. .,...4•• 0- , I '"N.., • , •-••-• - .11, S". * c—.0 S g . 'ie ,.../._ „...• .. -bir- ,. t hI ..44\\IV 7 : o o ,,,,e.-.-:: g . , .s?..-.5.. ''' T --, , : .„. 7 11, i - t '''',.- i i .., . -. 41110.1.0.''... •,.... 1 . ,,.. . % -S'• i i I .. ' . * .. A (2 ''. . . ...... 1 -....#'"1-- -IF"Itt , _ , 'e . • ' - 1,‘ 1 ' • ii, . or .. , . . .,t„„. . , p 0 tl*,'..? 4•13784,10NN :ii..ra: ,,„..11 jt 1... • . , .i I i• , '. r t,:,•• , :. • . VW.• . . .10.”°....g.:14......r:17.-7 AV.,'•• . • .' ' . ... . , •• .‘'• • \ ,.. L ,I' / . . 1,1111Zer-. ,,,' ‘ 1 10 r 6 4 A e:41 tilk?',......ity • . . ••••• i Jew-4i 'iti .I/e .... . • .i.., —....ft......:. „ . w-----i lig - ' ,,/. s ...' , . . F A. ..). , . tu• t,„•c „. ,...4411i, -• or'. '•,,Ii.,a, ,„ 'IP - . , * -4 • • • Li, .....„-•,._ .4, '''' ''............, ' ,. -,. *:'.. P . ._ arm, . , . , . , , ' \ ' , . , ' . • * ' • • ' A''4 : : — '1 .A. • - - , It Ilmlop i , lith •. i‘ 1 "V*. ,, „,..401k A 7 \,/\„; , , ' : ' . ' ` • if.'/ • •.,- / \ / ' 1' '•? / ‘, \ , . .' .., ( / '. ' 'l ; i ; ,. ' • '' ' '' ' . '. „ ' ,P) .. • •/ / ,.. ./. ; 4 \ V ,' . , . , *ipe '''. :. ; '\` V l " , ,\'101111‘1111111111bb --' ' ‘40111.!'. I . .. , • • ,./ . . , .. I - . ,,,. , 1 "•••••••..- ' le"- , V,, .• . , \ \\ , '4 0 le&N 1 1‘1 I Ki,0•'''- . ,. • ' °..tr . ', k \i ;iiif f '1/4,viarist...... . . .ip , ......1-......___ _ , I VII.' +1.1111r4 &lAi. •• -. ' , it rior,- -.:•• •,-••:. ,.. • •,. • . sAk ........ , i _ .,. ..I t _. ,•,‘. *.. ,Etiiii1 . ... . A TALKING TO OUR Seminole County Community COMMUNITY Concerns & Priorities Seminole County Open As a part of the Vision Zero Action Plan development, House & Pop-Up Events Seminole County hosted open houses and pop-up events in each municipality to educate the public about the • April 2, 2024: Lake Mary purpose of Vision Zero, and to better understand the Lake Mary Senior Center, transportation issues from a community based perspective 91 1 Wallace Ct, Lake Mary, rather than just relying on crash data. The project team FL 32746 displayed informational boards that describe what Vision Zero and the Safe Systems Approach are, and where • April 3, 2024: Oviedo the local High Injury Network crashes have occurred. To Oviedo City Hall, 400 collect feedback from the community, the project team Alexandria Blvd, Oviedo, FL 32765 utilized an online comment form created by the Vision Zero Regional Team. • April 11, 2024: Altamonte The first three open houses were hosted in Lake Mary and Springs Westmonte Park, 624 Bills Ln, Oviedo in the evening, and Altamonte Springs during the Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 mid-day hours respectively. Following the open houses, Seminole County hosted four pop-up events. These events • May 29, 2024: Altamonte focused on the "meeting people where they are at" Springs approach. Altamonte Springs SunRail Station, 2741 S Ronald As a part of public engagement efforts, the Vision Zero Reagan Blvd, Altamonte Central Florida website has a "Help Identify Safety Springs, FL 32701 Problems" tab for the public to provide feedback noting specific locations in the region that feel unsafe to travel in. • June 1, 2024: Sanford Sanford Farmer's Market 150 E 1st St, Sanford, FL i 500 + 32771 Seminole County community • June 1, 2024: Winter Springs members spoken to during Black Hammock Trailhead the project duration 1571 E State Rd 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708 • June 6, 2024: Casselberry LYNX Fern Park Super Stop, Fernwood Blvd & Oxford Rd, Fern Park, FL 32730 VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD Community Feedback Enhances the Plan Crash data alone does not tell the whole story - community conversations were vital to confirming and adding context to high crash areas within Seminole County. Feedback was used to guide emphasis areas and identify percieved roadway risk that may show up as near misses today, but could be deadly in the future. ' peedbum s needed. Cars hit , p� ) lwould like to see 50mph daily in a 25mph zone. Too long more multimodal of a straight road without bumps for a paved trails around neighborhood. Very unsafe. the county. speed roundabouts trails education agreeable sidewalks connectivity multimodal wa l ka b i l ity enforcement lighting 43) -i-i 4 l • - AV 'i 1 1► \111. :--- --1 ;I ' _ 7 __, .....• ... 4v I. Lake Mary Sensor Center Open Housev. _ r r, _ - ��""```'"..-- -.; c. one of Vision What 4_ , .. , , ,i, _ ___ _— F , %. , ._ �� r Idenllldy�fMSde S 4 .: y i![E, _ :'-"L ''. IllgirAirm.7:`..-k. 'Y.."- ?II - ' .:vg. ri ' .- d, ,,,...__,. ,i, , _ _ _....,_ . , . , . .4 t._ - e diziP.140* drek.if WE,.-!,,mcrIzixfq„...,..,'4,4,,,,, - ., -- ...N„ ,„,„... :_:„..im ii L_,r , ..„...iiiy, -7 F-1. -fir { ' r 1 YL _ Longwood Farmer's Market w\:=>t : A ' ' . . \ ' ' . . ----.it ll 1Mt, 7.(, r . , —1,,1?h ey '1 . - 4 why 4 M l,i+ao+It • . '` i is ..w att., , , - — - .--, , i!c.r _Malik Al�1 MFMC's 37th Annual Mustang&Fay: I ,{ Roundup 11fr;14...6?4i r 'tea - 1 : , F. . 1` 1, ' ,.fit. . i r,' +s l . a' ty the Sole System A lititer. 'dill , _ '‘....* _. ..- .. ..,. nit 111211"- , aev 4 . ., _ ,,,..... . .„ f . r , 7,....•-•„,,,,. ,41.4.. ' +w c.. y.a +y, " *4 ! 'Zell"' .,‘_,.,w,,riliIII* Longwood 2nd Annual Walk for Autism e` ' Awareness&Inclusion IS1tNi.. — VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD City of Longwood Open City of Longwood Community Key House & Pop-Up Events Themes • December 9, 2023: Longwood Farmer's Market The first pop-up event the Vision Zero project team Reiter Park, attended was the City of Longwood Farmer's Market. This 311 W Warren Ave, weekly market has locally sourced foods and handmade Longwood, FL 32750 crafts. Attendees who visited the Vision Zero tent shared thoughtful stories about what transportation issues they • February 3, 2024: saw and experienced. Mid-Florida Mustang Club's (MFMC's) 37th Annual The Mid-Florida Mustang Club's 37th Annual Mustang & Mustang & Ford Roundup Ford Roundabout was hosted in Downtown Longwood. Downtown Longwood, This yearly event sees car enthusiasts from all over the 174 West Church Ave, region. The project team discussed vehicle safety and Longwood, FL 32750 how it applies to all road users. • April 27, 2024: The last pop-up event was the City of Longwood's 2nd Longwood 2nd Annual Walk Annual Walk for Autism Awareness & Inclusion. The project for Autism Awareness & Inclusion team spoke with over 100 attendees as well as the Mayor Reiter Park, of Longwood. Attendees discussed transportation issues 311 W Warren Ave, both in the City as well as regionally. Some attendees Longwood, FL 32750 from previous Longwood events also stopped by again to discuss Vision Zero. All of the public feedback collected for the City of Longwood has been heard in-person through the pop-up and workshop events. EVENT MATERIALS Path to .•. central Florida tinc • 00, dill Talking to Our Community 123 TALKING TO OUR Local Community Concerns & COMMUNITY Collaboration In addition to Seminole County open houses and pop-up events, each of the seven municipalities had their own pop-events for their own respective Vision Zero Action Plans. Overall, the Vision Zero project team attended over 23 events in 10 months. Concerns and collaboration are further detailed in each City Action Plan. ALTAMONTE CASSELBERRY LAKE MARY SPRINGS • February 9, 2024: • December 9, 2023: Food Trucks and Mardi Farmer's Market • December 15, 2023: Gras Party • April 17, 2024: Holiday Concert • March 16, 2024: Mind, Body, & Spirit: A • February 14, 2024: Spring Jazz & Arts Festival Celebration of Seniors Senior Fair • April 27, 2024: • April 26, 2024: • May 11, 2024: Earth Fest Arbor Day Park Party Family Fest LONGWOOD OVIEDO SANFORD • December 9, 2023: • January 15, 2024: • April 6, 2024: Farmer's Market Martin Luther King Jr. 39th Annual British Car Club • February 3, 2024: Day Celebration and Car Show MFMC's 37th Annual Parade • April 25, 2024: Mustang & Ford Roundup • March 23, 2024: District 2 Community • April 27, 2024: Taste of Oviedo Meeting Longwood 2nd Annual • June 15, 2024: • May 1, 2024: Walk for Autism Awareness CEOviedo at Versus Sanford Community & Inclusion Games Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Meeting • June 27, 2024: WINTER SPRINGS District 2 Community Meeting • November 8, 2023: Winter Springs Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee • December 2, 2023: Winter Wonderland • March 30, 2024: Egg-Citing Egg Hunt 2024 -. I V :: .Alf/16*. : - i S . ar - , . ,.... 1 ,i : •• •v•• , *, .....--,0 ... 1.-.'t. , . - - 1* . il I tf.,, i ..• ...•! ../ ) ,-, ,... .v.t._ -__I. i i. ,,,t0if . ( .4 , ' 4 "I'4 ' :Iota :04 .. .. ,, 1 i . . -psi 1 • . - s." . 'Y eta --Ili At 1 f ..... • & illik \ m . it „,„„..i...1... r . -..- ........ -.- alba 4111P Seminole County SunRail Station Pop- Up-Altamonte Springs I -' .01 • ' 111C I f1 Li 'IN Pe 1 e a. _ / . .. . ____ _ -- ... _ . • • 1 - 1 L 1 . .. , . • , . . .L. . . , • ....... _ - . , .i.;,,-,s,. .• , L•-• 401k --..1' I Or% 10, )ft0k,.. V---,`-,.2 1 : ____.... ....., ,...:Vic .; -...„,-- ___4911 ,,,,_ - • e: '', I , \ 1 ik it le '41--- L. - ., • / .. ... ---- A P -- .-!•••AL, N trilwri grf ,... ,_- -.. _ -,.„„ . _. .:, • •••, Sanford District 2 Community Meeting . .. Inei:PRIArt:44dt. , 16.1 t.. 1E1 L-11. 43 iM16.+ ii •"1 1-e-c.:74.. .. ge 1111I v ,.. 0 Li • ,, - Al ." .II. — i 1 • - • jt,'"' , ... ,,.. ""' '..-.'"--- ' : '“':" I, . •-• ..., • _or...."1 m -. f.;1( 1 1 NIMIEVI W .41 \ • III — • x I .. • • ___ i, ...„.-...,.. k.:. It i .. , -9•• ANSI .........a.,. •,.._.0. aiiii _.--- te INTMF .471440, --,,o-mi • ... 1 , - i 4011,,,, _- stir 1111 ":3&a.".. ."11fta VISION ZER co IRA'. CEOviedo at Versus Games-Oviedo iIIIIP C EN FlopRi DA °unting down to zero traffic deaths Focusing on Our Users This section highlights crash insights and the High Injury Network. r • • )1 pi .. • ..• ....,• =,.., ....• . . . • ,, - . . -• • .:-. - , .' •74,10, .: ;- - it • 1.. . - • . ...r . . ' 4, • • , . 1 ,..• ", . r . - - •.. , ' t 111,le- " •.411Pg.t.. 0' . ''''',VT ...'''''' ''' •• ';'' '.4. . J• - . .., 7, -- .• • • , .. 1, ,• b: - .... ,. •::' .;"'' : • • ,..! . f- ' s- , • 4,, . • . . .1%-• _ ,.,;--' -, . _3.. .•_ -,;. ,....it-•:, ...:.... ',.,,, ••••. • ,.. .. - . . .. < . : • ...,.0., , . . . .0. . . . A',r .! . . s. -; *.•.. - • 4 s . • ,'N -. . . \I , - . • . 'C P -: . . . ... , . , — -- ilk ,,, ... .i ,,.‘„ . . ,.. ,- •,•• _ .. , - • • •,-.„.,,, _. :\ . ,-- -- / ,, ' • ; ' ',,," .. , _ .., . .1 I . I . i . 'i %." - - .. •\'‘.-..,•4.,••• ...,- ' • i• • '., . •' . • t• , ... • 004,111' 1 i . 1 '- . : ,, • ,•,. ..„- -,... T,Ne ; . • , . L., -,• - A:1F .--'‘.... -AA- . ! . , . , , ,• -• : , • st „, . ,„,,o,--... ...,......-,...,..,----4,,,,,,, ....0,,iti,„L ' ,rp , .,,,e . - -- ' ^iroir .Z.,,- :...„...._ .-r- -.-- -- • 4- ..., i . ..:.., •-• '4,t if - . •/,--, . . 4. ..• , , , . _. . • ..N... . 7,..... ,.-. v . : -5..,. , , f . . - • ' ' . .7 . ...- 4„, . ,.... .i „.. • • . . , .. ..- . ..ti: • N..., - . ... . • -,„...,' • 71*.a. .*•,,A,, .... . — - - ....,'• •. v•; '''ie,.e A .- is- 4_ . ,- _ -.7, - ,.., . lirifir_ . ..- ,•' .441--1..._. *s . ''. - ., . _ - • • -,....„2-,...,56,;• _.,. ,....,..„,. ..,•:• . ' •_,-- _ ,.... ,..4,..-.' ... . .7,..„.,•.,-,'_......0.10,0,..,-0/-:,„.,,- ,, ,_,,,,,_ , ..... • - -- . ,•:.....•• - • - : ,-...x...... , ..-",-- - - L.. , • IR e , , , .. - • - if-7.• V 6 , 4- -... - w '4 ake, ..,---- ..;.„,--....., ,•-• _..- 4101111'- i'- ' • • _ ../ .., -..- . %-: „.., - 0.• °',/,i i. • ••••. - „,, ia,:i' i _, • , 'Y..'' .e. .i,4,.•_ ..., •,.. .r. Is.-.ir...f• 414,1 '' r , . , s \ I $ , i . , • .. -X .,,, ''. ' .. r'. .., ..**':. *,,'. r''i• ' kr" 4, : ..,';/. '..-' '.''J s' , E._ • i ,... II • -.- II.Z,,..-4...-.. 4'1.. 'I'. 7. .'.'.• ' 'i• .*. .• . ' . . i ''' ,' , . .... `.. . '0, -... * ...v. I me t ..3 . ,. , . . : ‘ .1 -t ) '' • .'-''''' , 4 : .i .. .- -?i•,‘'-4- -: • ,: ...." , .. ,%. el • •• , ...v. . .. _:1. 'r ....0 ,v, ..;,,,. , • „,„ ‘,4t . I, i.,p,. ' ii 7 ' ., , . .4. pl..x900.• . .".,,..• •• 4. • t4. ',''''. . L. . . ,.'1. - • .. . 7."' ar.. ' • ' , •• *. . 4 .!, . 1. '• ' 11.4 1 HE : . .- -. .. - ••"‘ 4-iii4 .•;•••4' • • .,, . or ... ‘• >. r ' • t` - t i J , • •1 .. i . .•.' , r iiii . or-- . ,* ,..-.:.°‘• . . ,..-A:fr.•-•.:.:.L''. t..- '1.:i'•• ' .I 41‘... .4.! . •* • a, ': .0 .4 ' • . . - , 1 ' 1. , 114 ir ,.4-'. "'i''`... Illilef .• st• _ . ...;• 1."4 - .. . , . ...t,t.• , . -14: .--_-t. . V` • I.,• .,,,, •-.. P • . i ir? •-•' ' .11 ov - „. ......• • it 1 V ( $_ llie "''' . i .i , 14.__Ia.ii. ir . - l• . ..),,-. *. ",, 1, 1 ' , .tT '' ..,' ii.Alr'lliP ..-., ., , t ' ril 1 7-, . •,'- .14;...""--7"" • 4,• -als- - ••,'•' ....., *$ • ' i,.i . ;' , •, • . 6—.: I 1-..••r. .....iree le• c i i , i . ., , .. ..:, .. V. a ..,... , , • • :,......j. . . . .i. 4. ir ....44( . i\' 1 i IV 1 .. , ,: ,. i 1 1 1 1 t 1 al . •• . 4 1 • " - ' 4 E07.1 IL .9- v v.11.1,-,, ., 0„, ',, 4 0 r''r•:'`,.„ I , ,,, , i.I.,. . lir .1, . . ..._ IP . , • . ?' ,' . ' ,, „ 'i ' ' ." .11.1r et.7. .1 ,,,r.' • .. . . ._ • • FOCUSING ON Evaluating Crash Data & Trends OUR USERS In striving toward Vision Zero, a data-driven approach is critical to uncover the details of deadly and serious injury Serious Injury: May crashes. This includes reviewing locations, frequency, and also be referred to as contributing factors. Understanding where and why these an incapacitating injury. crashes happen is key. Serious injuries may Even one life lost is too many. The City of Longwood lost include broken bones, nine people over the five year period from 2018 to 2022. severed limbs, etc. These These deaths and the 44 other serious injury crashes in injuries usually require Longwood are unacceptable. Deadly and serious injury hospitalization and crashes in Longwood are increasing over time. There is transport to a medical work to be done. Getting to, and staying at, zero deaths facility. and serious injuries is a partnership effort.A...ThWhat are major contributing factors to crashes? _ Contributing causes to crashes includes environmental factors such as the time of day or day of week, human _O O- factors such as age or distracted driving, and roadway factors such as speed and lighting condition. Roadway Human Factors Environmental • Speed • Aggressive Driving • Time of Day • Number of Lanes • Impaired Driving • Day of Week • Lighting Condition • Driver Inattention p...... ........34.1 Who are vulnerable users? Vulnerable users are those outside of a vehicle. People who are walking, biking, or driving a motorcycle. They are —O physically unprotected and are at greater risk of death or serious injury in a collision. Vulnerable users make up 36 percent of the deadly and serious injury crashes in Seminole County. 'II I_ lir What is a crash type? A crash type describes how the motorist or vulnerable �O user collided with another traveler or object. Crashes that involve turning are called "left-turn" or "right-angle" collisions. Some crashes only involve one motorist and are considered "off-road" or "single-vehicle" collisions. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD The city trend in traffic deaths and serious injury crashes is in a slight downtrend from 2018 to 2022. Deadly and serious injury crashes occurred 17 times in 2018. Five years later in 2022, they occurred 6 times. Of the deadly crashes, 88% of them occured on state roads. Vulnerable users make up 49% of the deadly and serious injury crashes. While all motor vehicle and motorcyclist deadly and serious injury crashes occurred on major roads, the bicyclist and pedestrian deadly and serious injury crashes occurred on major roads and local roads. Deadly and Serious Injury Crashes by Year 18 16 - a) 14 - Serious Injury Deadly U 0 10 _ 14 45 5 II II 10 z 6 75 4 ' io II 6 III4 -6 .1— 2 3 - 2 2 2 0 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Year Deadly and Serious Injury Crashes by Year and Mode 12 12 II Motor Vehicle N 10 ill Motorcycle a U` 8 II Pedestrian O 45 6 6 5 II Bicycle � 4 4 4 z 3 3 3 2 2 i 2 2 2 0 II 1 i 1 ; ■ Source:Signal Analytics, 0 Ii ■ 2018-2022;excludes 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 limited access facilities. Year Focusing on Our Users 129 ,f i HIGH INJURY NETWORK & ____ HIGH CRASH INTERSECTIONS �, w J i Longwood Hills Rd / 1 _i church q ve i 1(1 o' N c o ✓dc oce LONGWO1 Warren Ave // , 3 434\ 3 il__ -E U 6 i Li(\ ALTAMO TE SPRING Source:Signal 4 Analytics, 2018-2022;excludes limited access facilities. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD 0 0.5 Miles /1 Legend High Injury Network (City Roads) J I � High Injury Network i (All Roads) rowsk Top 5 Intersections > (AII Roads) Crash Score • <_3,000 0 • 3,001 -4,000 N • >4,000 O WINTER 8 SPRINGS OD if1311 E Church Ave -'''' 4 High Injury Network (HIN) The High Injury Network is a collection of roads -o - where a disproportionate number of traffic m deaths and serious injuries occur. c o This data-driven approach uses roadway data, a n crash data, and crash weighting to assign scores to each roadway or intersection. The highest scoring segments are the HIN. Crashes TJ involving vulnerable users are weighted more heavily by a factor of 3. Dog Track Rd 5 CAS Two HINs were developed: Ls • All Roads - Any road in the county regardless of jurisdictional ownership including state, county, or city • • City Roads - Only roads under city 1 I jurisdiction Focusing on Our Users 131 DEADLY & SERIOUS CRASHES • (2018-2022) __ _ -- Cce o E w o Longwood od Hills Rd_ 4/ . . � 0 CI)u_ 'i ve -o L( cy i a) C — i a- L. i Warren Ave 1 0 C E •1 I v�'e ` 72 o 1 ALTAMO TE / , SPRING ! 1 Source:Signal 4 Analytics, 2018-2022;excludes limited access facilities. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD 0 0.5 J __w. �..___ Miles 4 / Legend — County Roads • J .M / oLii .. .. 0 fora. e • O Dv D) • 0 • N� 0 O O O c 0 O HI 3NGWOOD o a o : WINTER ,` , o 0 o • CRASH LOCATIONS • 1111 There are only few deadly or serious injury E Church Ave r crashes on City roads. However, we know O O I City residents don't just travel on their home • streets - they travel along SR 434, US 17- 4 __ • � `` 92, Ronald Reagan Boulevard, and other ` ( ? 0'` `�' � major roadways. Longwood Hills Road is 0 ta one location that stands out. The northeast quadrant of the City is another area that • stands out as a high crash area. While there -UI 0•!_1 have been no deadly crashes and just two 00 , o _ serious injury crashes, there are pockets of E • intersection injury crashes that should be o r proactively monitored as the City grows. a) j ter" •N- • o1 • In the City: �- -r • -- DogTrand 1 , 1 7 , - • • \ : DeadlyCrashes rashes. ., r 44 Serious Injury Crashes • 778 Injury Crashes Focusing on Our Users 133 d DEADLY & SERIOUS CRASHES (2018-2022) - BY MODE AND __ _ __ y', J DISADVANTAGED AREAS 1 r c. rf w 2 J Longwood Hills Rd R L— 7 r—' 0 Chvrc, 'q i'e 1 -o ,! a) c o LONGWO1 cz Warren Ave 0 --j • 434, Lz ...-40‘ 4 L U 3 7 r o p I - n...2 ' ALTAMO>TE . SPRINGS J VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD i i ./ ./ z / ems _- / Legend h/ • Pedestrians 0 Deadly Crashes Motor Vehicle Serious "" Outlined in Black Crash Density 1 •4. • Bicyclists Low High • 0 HIN Segments 1 ' � • Motorcyclists City Roads J w% Disadvantaged Areas r /� • Motorists All Roads fir// i (65%or more)-meets I f USDOT threshold //� Disadvantaged Areas (50%or more) Tb ] /A/lt/ tO) / / / /Z./ / i Vr. / , /- , 1 . a /. /i ,iri 'i i J ,. EQUITY o // / / '' .�/ . '# Historically underserved communities �0 . / / � //// /, �4 #" experience a higher proportion of / �� / / �/ , / /,� deadly and serious injury crashes. ///I/ /. //r/ / I,,/ These communities are typically more MY/ . / / / ,# reliant on walking, biking, and transit. OR, /�r z.. / / !/�/ The USDOT designated disadvantaged ..r hutch Ave / 1 -- (65%or more) census tract 121 17022101 i /✓1' z C; area has an approximate population Q/ _/ / / /X. / of 7,000 people which includes both ■. ©/ / , �, � +�[ / 0,,,,:j � the City of Longwood and the City of �� 4 �. piiiii0 / ©• ._ Winter Springs. This area experiences J. / both environmental burden and health • tr ,,,,,_,,,,,, / /� Qvulnerability. / / / ‘/ / ��-�/ /' Deadl and Serious In'ur/ /i/ / / Y 1 Y e / / / / / /// //►: J / Crashes by Mode //.p U. / /r / / /r/� /r 4 7 j�'/ / gym /./ / / ✓ r , , - / /4 Ir. / °- ''' / /o .; /r /i // 4,6orck Rd��//0 Oa k 7 i S 1 %a G J r r //..._./, /2'/i.f::r// _ t //1 7,/"; . I� d r f ,` icyc e ;/�. ¼ % c' ilb\I '!Pedestrian • i ■Motorcycle ,;i , ■Motor Vehicle Source:Signal 4 Analytics, 2018-2022;excludes limited access facilities. Focusing on Our Users 135 , DEADLY AND SERIOUS MOTORIST CRASHES BY TYPE ,-t , --0 (2018-2022) I o / w a) J Longwood Hills Rd - L —1---- iif t I c urc 1 ',Ave I , . i •c 41 41+ /ii ow LONGWO( Ex Warren Ave .•(I) 434, ///au,/ Qu r"--C c U o � .( `o 00:, ALTAMO TE ( j..\ SPRING , (/ VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 1 CITY OF LONGWOOD •.. CRASHES BY TYPE Most deadly and serious injury crashes in Longwood were OM pedestrian and rear end collisions. The third most common was left turn collisions. Rear ends crashes were the most frequent out of the total number of crashes. 3 . 400 16 m 14 0 N 350 14 0 6' m 2 300L — 12 a 0 250 10 a Q >[--(- _a 200 m 0o j Z 1508ID' 0 10020 -All . - _ IIII 0 c Reo; Ofi vei vsI1 or,e pe° one e\cycle Heod Soles 0 Eno Roo° turn pne eect'°e On venkcte 5°e5tP F1 \, D. C11:I SPRINGS OD E Church Ave 411. , ilk I0 X -- �--- a CIP ......._..._.'...._.-._ -7 1 G ,._ c--,-,2 . i ii:30 , scyrc_ - ri r, _ i C ' ce Z ., tillik ilk L.a k• al Cilt ce CD Legend iii" Dog Track Rd Z Angle , Sideswipe O Deadly Crashes -® } Head On Q Rollover Outlined in Black 1 i Left Turn Q Off Road I / k CO Rear End Other Source:Signal 4 Analytics,2018-2022;excludes limited access facilities. Focusing on Our Users 137 DEADLY & SERIOUS CRASHES ____M BY LIGHTING (2018-2022) / r-- _I 3 E / I Longwood Hills Rd ...---, .—7 . —= LT I f 1 5 r • • .... ., Rvt t Y, c .e N. - t fy c -). # T:-D \ cz 1 Warren Ave "' , . LONGY _F U 3 .`o 0 ALTAMOIITE it SPRING ..\ Source:Signal 4 Analytics, 2018-2022;excludes limited access facilities. Roadway lighting data obtained from Seminole County Traffic Engineering and the City of Longwood. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Legend • Dawn / Dusk 0 Deadly Crashes LIGHTING/TIME OF DAY Daylight Outlined in Black The later in the day it gets, the more County and State deadly and serious injury crashes occur. • Dark-Lighted Roadway Lighting In Longwood, the hours of 3 PM to 6 • Dark- Not Lighted PM account for the most deadly and serious injury crashes for motor vehicles. / However, the hours of 6 PM to 9 PM O , become the worst for vulnerable users. `— As daylight turns to dusk, lighting 44 > becomes a more important roadway m i i characteristic. Of the injury crashes a that occurred in the dark, 4%were in a locations without lighting. m* T O c_ O4 0, c e t . , of deadly or serious injury v crashes happened outside of daylight hours f t • ! ,.... E-Church Ave 1311 0 c' 'cio- 34% ‘oog ,..,,...0.,,,..,... A ...4.7-r . .,... ri7 © Lake 111111 Wfldrnere ■Daylight IN Dusk 4% °D •Dark-Lighted a p ° ■Dark-Not Lighted aid n gig*j 12 a) 11 1 j-c: .t- '' 10 c t 68 O , 4 a8 _ Dog Track Rd .� CASSEL6 6 5 s ' i.. E 4 Lm "lb „. ., q 3 3 3 3 il °' © 2 2 — — t ` 2 1 1 1 ALAI_ A_ 1 1 i 4- L'� O 12AM- 3AM- 6AM- 9AM- 12PM- 3PM- 6PM- 9PM- 3AM 6AM 9AM 12PM 3PM 6PM 9PM 12AM Time of Day ■Motor Vehicle Death or Serious Injury ■Bike, Ped,or Motorcycle Death or Serious Injury Focusing on Our Users 139 FOCUSING ON The Impact of Speed on Survival OUR USERS Speed is a major factor in survival rate. 71% of all traffic deaths and serious injuries in the County were on roads with posted speed limits of 40 miles per hour or higher. This data does not consider the speed at which the collision ,i occurred, which could be much higher than the il , ,- 4 ' posted speed limit. fi , . `"? n , �. , High speed is particularly impactful for vulnerable 25`MPH _ roadway users involved in crashes with vehicles. National data shows that nearly any pedestrian hit by a vehicle traveling at 45 mph or above will be killed — there is only a 15% chance of survival. t As speed increases, the toll on the human w T. ,; r body increases and the driver's cone of vision ''51- k 14,, decreases. Deploying roadway design changes '02461.0. .)4410111ftlik to reduce speeds is critical to Vision Zero. of 1.-v,,L-'3iirt-Mt' 0, 45 MPH If hit by a car traveling • Person dies in collision • Person survives collision 0 0 Ir /1, /1, /1, /1, 11, /1, /1, /1, 25MPH 5% 0 0 t t If It t 4. 'It A ik * 35MPH 45% 0 �0 If t It I 1 It It t * 45MPH 85% Data Source:National Traffic Safety Board(2017) VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD The Impact of Human Factors Survival Humans make mistakes. Behavioral factors such as drinking and driving can influence the outcome of a crash. Younger and older people are especially vulnerable to serious injury. Ia. Regional ei1 in 3 serious injury crashes involves distracted driving. _ 1 in 5 deadly crashes involves drunk driving. •IN!11 1 in 6 involves drugs. j Only 6% of drivers are teens, but are in 13% of serious injury crashes. t10% of all serious injury crashes are hit-and-runs. That number doubles when the person hit is walking or biking. Seminole County �� 1 in 8 deadly or serious injury crashes involved • distracted driving. 1 in 14 deadly and serious injury crashes involves drunk 141.• driving. 1 in 25 involves drugs. y Only 17% of the County is age 65 or older- they are involved in 23% of deadly and serious injury crashes. 6% of all deadly and serious injury crashes are hit-and-runs. City of Longwood Alp 1 in 9 deadss o dv ��' serious injury ly crashescrahe involved invlved distractedistracted driving.driing. 41% of _ , 1 in 9 deadly crashes involved drunk driving. Zero crashes involved drugs. 2 of the 9 deadly crashes was a teen driver. 11% of serious injury crashes involves a teen. offt Zero deadly or serious injury crashes were hit-and- runs crashes. Focusing on Our Users 141 Getting to Zero This section highlights agency coordination and the toolbox of strategies and countermeasures. To achieve zero deaths and serious injuries, Longwood should collaborate and rely on proven strategies and countermeasures. 44{ 7-,. \i1�•} .. . . -, , • 11/ f1{ ,1 tip-::,,. • '/ • . • _.- • • "T ► �: '" it ''rid, �, y /.4;...r..... . 14 1.1i. . i ir\it . '1•-• , , •1, -- - • ih7, ,f , , 1 , ,: 1 . _. • ``I • �.. • - =ram tt 1 • • ' • • 1\ , s :s ; �e 3 F-jc y . • ` 1 1 ? 1 it -.4'..:-...IV 1 • - 1 . . del, 0 �►`; ,,,'.).„1.,, ,,,..,1 S I.!4,. .,t. fs •• . • ,.. . •. J 1 • •: . . .i'- 'l �.. .e•. _ y '+ fir _ l 11f1 _ _ _/ Vision Zero Central Florida by the Numbers Vision Zero Central Florida has been a monumental effort. Public engagement strategies were aimed at collecting feedback from residents and visitors and included a range of in-person and online opportunities. 23 1 Regional Task Force 3 CountySteeringCommittees Vision Zero Action Plans 1 8 Local Workinc Groups v l� 150+ 400+ 40 + local government views of Call-to-Action community events with meetings video 1 , 000 + 15 + 30+ interactions with updates to MetroPlan mentions on local media the public Orlando Board and outlets committees Over 5 1 Safety Champion Speaker Regional Press Conference 1 °/ °°° Series Events views by over 2700 unique users of 345 + VisionZeroCFL.gov survey responses VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA I CITY OF LONGWOOD Strategize with Key Stakeholders Regional Vision Zero lit Seminole County Local Municipality Task Force Steering Committee Working Groups The Regional Vision Zero The Seminole County The Working Groups are Task Force was structured Steering Committee is composed of city staff to develop a framework comprised of Seminole who can promote Vision for continued action for County staff and local Zero through different the implementation and municipal staff, as well departments and actions. monitoring phases of the as local leaders who can The Working Groups are Action Plan at a regional support the County and similar to the Regional Task level. This Task Force Local Action Plans. Vision Force and the County-level includes a diverse set of Zero relies on shared Steering Committee to regional perspectives responsibility and authentic include participation from and county and local engagement. multiple city departments. agency staff to help inform They are tasked with what materials should be carrying out the Action Plan prepared at the regional following its adoption. level to help support the County and Local Vision Zero Action Plans. WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Shad Smith, Director of Public Works / City Jared Roberson, Fire Marshall Engineer Sgt. James Finch, Traffic Sergeant Eric W. Nagowski, Public Works Engineer Matt Hockenberry, Streets and Stormwater Anjum Mukherjee, Senior Planner Division Manager Michael Peters, Fire Chief Summer Raines, Geographic Information Troy Feist, Deputy Chief Systems (GIS) Analyst CITY OF LONGWOOD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS . • i • • • Photo Unavailable Photo Unavailable • •. :.' ' ':: P # . • . • • . • • . . Shad Smith Eric W. Nagowski Anjum Mukherjee Matt Hockenberry Director of Public Streets and Stormwater Works/City Engineer Public Works Engineer Senior Planner Division Manager Photo Unavailable .'• 1+� Photo Unavailable r �'� Summer Analyst nes, A . . % 1. Michael Peters Troy Feist Jared Roberson Sgt.James Finch . • : . • • • Fire Chief Deputy Chief Fire Marshall Traffic Sergeant : Getting to Zero 145 . ' • _— � _ • -N . 4- a ! ■ t •ji= .AI } -/�)- - -. Is ... - - '_'— CSC' a... T a .. .. - jr"." •r _ Intersection of US 17-92 and SR 434 Your status message is showing in chat and channels whenmessage people or @mennttion you. 11 ID CD TamCCOSIol Pop out Chat emote Ram Reset Yew Rooms tops More lr u. II '` in) 41) 0 41110 ali A M S D .1407-26- s .1 407-26_ 1, lam Oouek_ x Mgum Mu.. 1 fared Rabe_. A, Slade Dow_ * Matt Hackedbe_ • e C 1 D— x w.sn....trn . )r..Z.wr. 0 x C^"«•gyp MetroPlan Orlando Vision Zero(HOP Two) Q n - - /, a 33 /; 0 , /I . o 0 q .... / , e b Working Group Meeting #3 - �,:. -1 O ;a -aa_ VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA CITY OF LONGWOOD Strategize with Key Stakeholders The City of Longwood Working Group met three times Working Group Dates throughout the plan development. As the Action Plan • is completed and adopted, the Working Group will Working Group Meeting #1 - shift their focus on implementation and monitoring of October 3 ? Kickoff- Whhatt is Vision Zeros . projects within the plan and monitoring the serious injury Virtual Meeting and fatal crashes within the county limits. Additionally, the Working Group will strive to follow the goals and timelines set forth in the Action Plan. • Working Group Meeting #2 - January 30, 2024: During the first and second working group meetings, Crash Analysis and High Injury there was a question and answer opportunity in Network between each section of the presentation. Questions Virtual Meeting and answers are summarized below: • What do you think are the biggest barriers to Working Group Meeting #3 - April 15, 2024: reaching zero traffic deaths and serious injuries? Countermeasures & Potential • Distractions • Generational effort Projects • Human nature • Lighting Virtual Meeting How would you describe the roadway safety culture in your agency and community? • Multiple areas could use • Residents rush through improvements neighborhoods during rush hour Did you expect other roads to be on the High Injury Network? Would you like to see any changes? • Expected to see HIN farther • Rangeline Rd crash north on US 17-92 surprising • +,.•.c ��%rites - - .r Alr/0 CR 427 and SR 434 • Getting to Zero 147 GETTING TO Using Proven Safety Countermeasures ZERO The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has 28 proven safety countermeasures. These countermeasures have been used in many states and on roads of many kinds. This list is a starting point for project identification, though countermeasures don't end here. Over 100 different countermeasures were considered as part of this action plan. Most countermeasures have what's called a Crash Modification Factor (CMF). This research-backed factor tells us the potential crash reduction percentage. Signals Speed Pedestrian Management Facilities 6)) Extend Yellow ED �M25 5Appropriate ♦and All Red Time Speed Limits ♦iAdd Sidewalk rr Leading S eed A Pedestrian p Pedestrian \� �� Cameras / Hybrid Beacon Interval Signing and SPEED Rectangular g g LIMIT Variable Rapid Flashing Striping In Speed Limits Beacon Chevron Signs on Horizontal Bikeways Curves • Bike Lane/ Curve Advance CEO Buffered/ Warning Sign Nov Separated Bike Lane Separated Bikeway VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA CITY OF LONGWOOD Did you know? These countermeasures have the potential to reduce deadly and serious injury crashes by up to: LIGHTING LEADING PEDESTRIAN ROUNDABOUTS 28% on roadways INTERVALS 78% at intersections 38% at intersections 13% at intersections (converted from signal) (vehicle-pedestrian 82% at intersections crashes) at intersections (pedestrians) (converted from stop sign) Intersections and Roadways Other Engineering Strategies Doubled-Up, ® Oversized Stop T Refuge Island Intersection �//1►V �� Lighting Signs High Friction Retroreflective Surface Signal Segment lar Treatment Backplates Lighting �� Access v 4 , Lane -; RoundaboutiiirD Management/ ` '+ Repurposing �� Close Driveway IL. Median Barrier �' Rumble Strips f ' Raised Median ��J ■ ■ Reduced Left- Turn Conflict Intersection Getting to Zero 149 Action Plan This section outlines the recommendations, projects, and next steps following plan adoption. These actions are ambitious, but achievable through collaboration and measurable goals. . i . .....47, 41111e11"P.' lbitlltllIllL 110 1... ... - lir ..• �- s 4 01 7 _. ,_ _ • _ „:„.......,„„..._ ,,, .,., ....... .., ..., __. . . .. , 1 , K .. . -__ .. A. J. • .,, . 1 �' .1 t _... ,,„., . .. ,.„, , . .....,:40. i..,i .i' 11.4.i• i 1 .7. y dr 1../1 i w • i (i,r, . ., ,, • . , Syr i J 1�- I.i..`� .� ^ erg •Mil'•'►' F _'�I1'1 �.�11 - _ -.� Imo• --: �r11• .. -�... - •. . ��t •. rl�_ fir, 3.04114 ' (. - / •S gyp• Ir 7 _ ` Adllir • • 41,',. • irY AO .: � fie r '+ o, '411.111 F -�f3g. `w l k.. r`. rrsl ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Design roadway environments to mitigate human mistakes and account for injury tolerances, to encourage safer behaviors, and to facilitate safe travel by the most vulnerable users. SAFER ROADS ACTION DESCRIPTION While there are only 2 deadly or serious injury crashes on City roads, the northeast quadrant of the City has several injury crashes.This portion of the City is in a historically underserved area (meeting the USDOT threshold), is adjacent to the SunRail station and has future land use designations for medium density residential (versus low density residential in most other neighborhoods). It is recommended quick Pilot Quick Build build safety projects are proactively piloted in this area. Quick build Projects with infrastructure projects are temporary, lower cost installations with that can be constructed in a condensed timeframe, achieve safety goals, Traffic Calming and inspire permanent change. It is recommended the City pilot these Countermeasures, types of safety projects,which may such as median choker island Especially in the installations, mini roundabouts, and crosswalk markings.The southeast Northeast Quadrant quadrant of the City should also be considered as it is also meets the • USDOT's threshold for a historically underserved community. of the City The City's 2045 Mobility Plan identifies several roadways in this area for traffic calming or bicycle and pedestrian improvements. It is recommended these projects,where possible, be advanced as a quick- build and later converted to a permanent project should the pilot be successful based on factors such as crash history, community feedback, vehicle travel times, and observed speeds. The City's Complete Streets Policy, adopted in 2015, has resulted in sustained progress throughout the city. From planning to design to Establish / Adopt construction, there are complete street projects both completed or in progress all across Longwood.The City is also driving progress through Multimodal the Mobility Plan and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which Crossing Design identify a network of facilities. As projects move into design, crossing Preferences to Build opportunities and crossing treatments become crucial to a seamless multimodal network. It is recommended the City develop or adopt on Complete Streets crossing preferences such as geometric features and enhanced Policy and Existing sightlines, crossing types (i.e., signalized versus unsignalized), and Transportation Plans signage and striping. These preferences can be matched to the Mobility Plan's roadway typologies. Crossing guidelines are available from the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), FDOT, and others. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH 2045 Mobility Number of pilot Start Year 3 Public Works (Lead) $-$$ Plan, Bicycle projects and Pedestrian Master Plan Adoption of Longwood Multimodal Design Start Year 2 Public Works (Lead) $-$$ Complete Streets Preferences Policy Action Plan 153 11 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY QDesign roadway environments to mitigate human mistakes and account for injury tolerances, to ./K. encourage safer behaviors, and to facilitate safe travel by the most vulnerable users. SAFER ROADS ACTION DESCRIPTION It is recommended every development project include a safety review Include Safety against the City's Vision Zero Action Plan. Crash history and future travel patterns should be considered to identify both corrective and proactive Countermeasures safety countermeasures such as curb radii-reductions, crosswalk in Development additions and improvements, enhanced transit stops, and traffic signal Agreements improvements. New developments may change existing behavior and travel patterns, especially for new housing developments near the Sun Rail Station. Coordinate with FDOT is in the design phase for a resurfacing project which includes FDOT and the project goals of improved safety and enhanced mobility.The design County on Projects phase is planned for completion in early 2026. It is recommended through the City, the City continue to work with FDOT to provide input on the design, especially related to pedestrian crossing opportunities and relationship Especially the SR 434 to transit stops. Resurfacing Project For future FDOT or County projects within the City, it is recommended from Rangeline Road the City conduct the same coordination process and work together to to West of Talmo develop solutions with the safety information presented in this Action Street Plan. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Longwood New developments Community Development Development evaluated for safety Start Year 1 (Lead), Public Works $ Code, Longwood measures (Support) Development Dashboard Coordinaton Start Year 1 Public Works (Lead) $ FDOT Work conducted Program Action Plan 155 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY oDesign roadway environments to mitigate human Ak. mistakes and account for injury tolerances, to encourage safer behaviors, and to facilitate safe travel by the most vulnerable users. SAFER ROADS ACTION DESCRIPTION The City has consistent segment or intersection lighting coverage within most of the City limits and on most High Injury Network segments with one exception-SR 434. It is recommended the City work with FDOT to install segment lighting. All seven of the pedestrian deaths or serious injuries on SR 434 occurred in dark conditions. While six of the seven crash conditions noted lighting was present, the City Working Group acknowledges the lighting may be incomplete and only be present on Support Segment one side of the road or one corner of the intersection.The City Working Lighting Project on Group also acknowledges crash data is imperfect. A desktop review SR 434 revealed some crash locations, such as SR 434 at St Laurent Street,were reported as having lighting present though streetlights could not be confirmed. A lighting project should also be supported along SR 434 east and west of the City, with neighboring cities including Winter Springs and Altamonte Springs. Utility work such as replacing an underground water line often requires roadway excavation.This provides an opportunity for safety countermeasures to be implemented once the work is completed and Coordinate Safety the road is replaced. Projects such as lane narrowing with restriping, Improvements with lane repurposing, crosswalk marking, bicycle lane installation, and curb-radii reductions are examples of safety improvements achievable Utility Projects with roadway marking. It is recommended this Vision Zero Safety Action Plan, the City's Mobility Plan, and the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan be cross referenced against any utility project underway for opportunity to include safety improvements. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH City of Winter Lighting added to Springs and City SR 434 Start Year 1 Public Works (Lead) $ of Altamonte Springs Vision Zero Action Plans Coordinated utility project Start Year 1 Public Works (Lead) $-$$ - improvements Action Plan 157 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY .4S Promote safer speeds in all roadway environments through a combination of thoughtful, equitable, context-appropriate roadway design, appropriate speed-limit setting, targeted education, outreach SAFER SPEEDS campaigns, and enforcement. ACTION DESCRIPTION Speeding is a major contributor to deadly and serious injury crashes. It is recommended that speed feedback signs (or changeable message signs) be implemented on Rangeline Road. Rangeline Road is the only Install Speed City-owned High Injury Network segment. It is the most direct north-south Feedback Signs, connection coming from the west and experiences speeds 7 mph or higher than the posted speed limit. Other City roads that experience Especially on speeding and may be considered for speed feedback signs are Church Rangeline Road Avenue and Warren Avenue.Signs should be located between traffic signals where vehicles typically gain the most speed or at locations where roadway context changes. Actual speed data may be tracked to evaluate the impact of each sign. SR 434 and US 17-92 account for the highest number of pedestrian Support Lowest Target deadly and serious injury crashes in the City.There are also many serious injury crashes on Ronald Reagan Blvd. With the complexity of Speed for SR 434, these three roadways through the city's urban center and the mix of Ronald Reagan Blvd, multimodal users, it is recommended a target speed of 35 mph be and US 17-92 supported.The speed limit is currently 45 mph on SR 434.The City should work alongside FDOT to set the lowest target speed allowable and to facilitate improvements to achieve these target speeds. Speed kills. Speed is a major factor in the outcome of a traffic crash, Evaluate Feasibility of especially for our children and elderly population. A "Twenty is Plenty" strategy should be considered for residential streets.This would include Deploying "Twenty is a default posted speed limit of 20 mph on all residential streets.The Plenty" Speed Limit "Twenty is Plenty" strategy will compliment the surrounding roadway Strategy plans and set a precedent for all residential streets.The goal of this strategy is to reinforce a low-speed environment.The City may also offer yard signs for residents to support this strategy. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Number of roadways MetroPlan with speed Orlando Speed feedback signs and Start Year 2 Public Works (Lead) $ Management measured speeds after implementation Study (2022) MetroPlan Adoption of lowest Start Year 1 Public Works (Lead) $ Orlando Speed target speed Management Study (2022) MetroPlan Evaluation of Start Year 3 Public Works (Lead) $ Orlando Speed strategy Management Study (2022) Action Plan 159 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY 1S*I 0 0 Safe road users means safe people. Encourage o% o safe, responsible driving and behavior by people who use our roads and create conditions that SAFER ROAD prioritize their ability to reach their destination unharmed. USERS ACTION DESCRIPTION Motorcycles account for 21%of all deadly and serious injury crashes in Partner with the City. Partnering with motorcycle safety organizations, such as Ride Motorcycle Safety Smart Florida, can help increase awareness throughout the county and emphasize the shared responsibility of all road users. Opportunities for Organizations partnership may include joint tabling events, social media campaigns, and collaborate meetings for sharing latest trends and progress. The summer school driver's education program offered by Seminole Coordinate Traffic County Public Schools is an excellent option for new drivers. It is Safety Presentations recommended that introductory traffic safety information is made available to students who are unable to attend the driver education with Schools program or do not yet have learner's permits.Traffic safety education is recommended at all levels of schooling, from elementary to high school. The City has a strong foundation of transparency into City operations, ongoing projects, and staff leaders. The City's Newsletter and departmental YouTube videos embedded on the City webpage are excellent examples. It is recommended the City build on these efforts Launch Vision Zero to publicize Vision Zero, trends in traffic deaths and serious injuries, and Public Campaign actions toward achieving Vision Zero. An ongoing outreach campaign is important to maintain awareness and momentum.The scale of this campaign can be tailored to match City staffing commitments and responsibilities. An overarching set of Vision Zero awareness campaign material is developed as part of this action plan. It is recommended the City build on their partnership with Bike/Walk Conduct High Central Florida (BWCF) for high-visibiltiy crosswalk enforcement through g the Best Foot Forward (BFF) program. In 2024, the BFF program showed Visibility Enforcement a driver yield rate improvement from 33%to 80%near Longwood Operation, Elementary School due to low cost crosswalk improvement. As speeding Especially in is a major factor in injury outcome, it also is recommended a targeted enforcement operation is also conducted on roadways with operating Coordination with speeds 7 mph (or higher) above the posted speed limit. MetroPlan BikeWalk Central Orlando's Speed Management Study identifies these roadways.Target Florida corridors for enforcement include city, county, or state roadways: Rangeline Road, Church Avenue, Warren Avenue, US 17-92, SR 434 west of Rangeline Road, Longwood Hills Road, and Dog Track Road. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Community and Media Number of Relations (Lead), organizations Start Year 1 Public Works (Support), $ - reached Community Development (Support), Motorcycle Organizations (Support) Community and Media Number of schools Relations (Lead), Public Seminole County reached Start Year 2 Works (Support), Seminole $ Vision Zero County Public Schools Action Plan (Support) Campaign Community and Media engagement Start Year 2 Relations (Lead), Public $-$$ - Works (Support) MetroPlan Police Department (Lead), Orlando Speed Number of drivers Coordination with Public Management reached Start Year 2 Works and Bike/Walk $ Study (2022), Central Florida (Support) BWCF BFF Progam Action Plan 161 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY r � Proactively plan for a connected and autonomous vehicle fleet and encourage the purchase of r ' vehicles that feature crash prevention technology. 0 SAFER VEHICLES ACTION DESCRIPTION Vehicles are regulated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Collaborate Administration (NHTSA). NHSTA implements laws from Congress. Vehicle with Professional seatbelt requirements is an example of this. As autonomous driving, distracted driving, and impaired driving continue, emerging legislation is Organizations a tool to reaching zero traffic deaths. Several professional organizations Furthering organize membership efforts to coalesce behind policy strengthening Safe Vehicle the transportation field. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) maintain policy positions to reduce traffic deaths and injuries, including Requirements collaboration for connected and autonomous vehicles, and often make supportive statements to Congress. Consider Emerging NHTSA has identified rulemaking initiatives for increasing vehicle safety. It is recommended the county compare the year of planned fleet Vehicle Safety vehicle purchases against the year of potential rule enactments to line Systems when up purchases with advanced safety features. For example, automatic Purchasing New emergency braking will be standard in cars and light trucks starting in Fleet Vehicles 2029.This automatic braking will detect both vehicles and pedestrians in both daylight and nighttime hours. Publicize the Availability of the NHTSA developed the "SaferCar" phone application for tracking active "SAFERCAR" Phone recalls.This application will deliver an alert when a recall is published. NHTSA estimates that millions of vehicle recalls each year are not Application for addressed. Recall Notifications VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Number of Public Works (Lead), Professional Start Year 1 Community Development $-$$ Organizations (Support), Professional collaborated with Organizations (Support) Rulemaking Fleet vehicles Fleet and Facilities (Lead), Reference:www. evaluated Start Year 3 City Manager's Office $-$$$ transportation. (Support) qov/NRSS/ SaferVehicles Number of Community and Media "SaferCar" phone Start Year 1 $ - applications Relations (Lead) Action Plan 163 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Enhance the survivability of crashes through — — expedient access to emergency medical care, while creating a safe working environment for vital first responders and preventing secondary crashes POST CRASH through robust traffic incident management practices. CARE ACTION DESCRIPTION To continue the best practices and data exchange upon the Meet with First completion of this action plan, it is recommended that Public Works Responders staff, first responders, and medical professionals meet at a defined Regularly interval each year to discuss how the barriers and opportunities for reaching Vision Zero are materializing. Promote CPR / Promoting CPR / Emergency First Aid Training to the community can Emergency First encourage those trained to support another person in any potentially deadly situation. While waiting for emergency services to arrive on Aid Training to the scene of a crash, it can serve as a temporary measure until professional General Public EMS arrives. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Police Department (Lead), Annual meeting Start Year 2 Coordination with Fire $ Department (Support) and Public Works (Support) Fire Department (Lead), CPR courses offered Start Year 2 Police Department (Lead), $-$$ - Public Works (Support) Action Plan 165 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY i Maintaining momentum to zero traffic deaths and serious injuries requires a sustained effort. These /,/211/ overarching actions will help us get there. CONTINUING PROGRESS ACTION DESCRIPTION It is recommended the City's Vision Zero Action Plan project webpage Develop Vision Zero be maintained and updated biannually with a status report on Vision Zero progress. Basic information should include the list of actions, the Status Report to status of each action (ongoing, complete, not started), and a summary Track Progress of recent activities.The most recent deadly and serious injury crash data should also be made available in the status report. To maintain momentum in the Vision Zero Action Plan, it is recommended the city's working group continue to meet periodically. Formalize Vision Zero A biannual meeting to discuss progress, outstanding actions, and emerging trends would provide productive touch points.The working Working Group group should meet 3-months in advance of publishing a Vision Zero Status Report to discuss data and progress on initiatives. Vision Zero plans may fail without sustained effort. It is recommended this plan be updated at a regular frequency.This is critical to adapting Update Action Plan strategies as our community evolves.The uptick in national traffic deaths started in 2010 and has been increasing since. Our approach to traffic Every 5-Years safety needs to be both proactive and responsive. A plan update allows for in-depth crash analysis, evaluation of previously deployed strategies, a fresh set of ideas, and a renewed commitment to zero. Similar to how the Florida Department of Transportation is organized with Create / Assign a Safety Office, it is recommended the City consider organizing staff Dedicated Staff resources to create a dedicated Safety Planner or Engineer position. This staff position would organizationally fit under Public Works and be Positionfor Safety responsible for overseeing safety on all project phases from planning to Planner or Engineer construction.This position would drive the execution of all actions in this plan, track progress, and coordinate with partner organizations. VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Relative Cost Description: $=Low or No Funding Required/Internal Staff Action, $$=Some Funding or Scope of Work Required, $$$=Higher Funding Required PERFORMANCE TARGET RESPONSIBLE RELATIVE INTEGRATES MEASURE YEAR PARTY COST WITH Public Works (Lead), Annual meeting Coordination with Start Year 1 Community Development $ - Development of (Support), and Community plan/progress report and Media Relations (Support) City Commission (Lead), Regional Vision Establishment of Coordination wth City Zero Task Force working group Start Year 1 Manager's Office $ and County (Support), and Public Steering Works (Support) Committee Adoption of Start Year 5 Public Works (Lead) $-$$ - updated plan Establishment / City Manager's Office (Lead), Coordination assignment of the Start Year 1 with City Commissioners $-$$$ - position (Support) Action Plan 167 ACTION PLAN Safety Projects, Implementation, and SUMMARY Project Prioritization Safety projects were developed collaboratively, using insights from the crash trends, high-injury networks, direction from the City working group, and community feedback. The process for identifying projects included a system-wide evaluation and a roadway-specific evaluation. High injury intersections are included in the roadway-specific evaluation. Anticipated project costs and an implementation timeline was also evaluated. Projects were then prioritized based on: • Crash scores • Being within a transportation underserved area • Anticipated safety benefit • Being on multiple high injury networks • Implementation timeline (higher scores for projects that may be completed in 5 years) This prioritization approach was also used at the regional level, based on priorities identified by the MetroPlan Orlando Board. A priority list was completed separately for county and state roads. The maps on the next pages highlight the priority segments. Details of each safety project and the full list of projects is in the Appendix. Project Planning Process STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 Analyze Analyze High Identify Projects Conduct Develop Network-Wide Injury Network Prioritization Implementation Opportunities Segments and Plan Top Intersections Incorporate Steps 1 &2 Quantitative and Use Countermeasure Cross Reference Based on Guidance Determine Timeframe Qualitative Toolkit Existing Projects from Regional Plans and Costs VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Top 1 City Road Project Priority List 1. Rangeline Rd, EE Williamson Rd/Longwood Hills Rd to SR 434 (1.05 miles) Safety improvements to increase pedestrian safety and manage speeds. Top 5 County and State Road Project Priority List 1. SR 434, Commerce Park Dr to Springwood Cir (0.47 miles) Safety improvements to increase visibility. 2. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Palmetto Ave to SR 434 (.38 miles) Safety improvements to increase pedestrian safety. 3. SR 434, Rangeline Rd to Ronald Reagan Blvd (0.97 miles) Safety improvements to increase active transportation safety. 4. SR 434, Ronald Reagan Blvd to US 17-92 (1.17 miles) Safety improvements to increase visibility and pedestrian safety. 5. US 17-92, Oak Ln to Dog Track Rd / Seminola Blvd (1.35 miles) Safety improvements to increase active transportation visibility and safety. The next steps for implementation of these projects may include road safety audits, concept development plans, and feasibility studies. Action Plan 169 NETWORK-WIDE PROJECTS El Longwood Hill's Rd r.I) Church I q ve l -0 w i - a c / I 'd a Warren Ave " 1i j � LON emmill.m.4341 c CD U 3 \ 1 0 ot 7 7 ,d00.3. 1 ALTAMO E /// L ____„____. SPRIN ��, VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 1 CITY OF LONGWOOD l 0 0.5 ___ .4,/i_ A `Y Miles 7 111441[Iiims_ , T , ------, 1 , , . //' 0 Legend o o Speed Feedback Sign Candidates -p (Observed speeds 7+ over the speed limit) a c eff_om Fill Lighting Gaps (Missing Roadway Lighting) 0 L Lane Repurposing Candidates SPRINGS —INetwork-Wide Projects E Church Ave �I This map provides systemic safety countermeasures that can be implemented proactively around the county, regardless of whether the road is on the high-injury network. ' These countermeasures can be implemented 92 independent of the priority projects: • Lighting • • Speed Feedback Signs m • Lane Repurposing c m • None of the roadways met the threshold for aai ! lane purposing at this time. cx '" The following strategies are also 0 recommended for evaluation on all principal, rz major, and minor arterials: Dog Track Rd CASS \ • Curb Radii Reductions L'' r ' • Leading Pedestrian Intervals • • No Right-Turn on Red Indications • Corridor Signal Retiming to Match Target Speeds I • Enhanced Transit Stops Action Plan 171 PRIORITY PROJECTS ___( 4 _J- I E E - J Longwood Hills Rd I1-1 1 iI Church ce i a) •c -J c '� LONGWO1 Warren Ave \\ ce 3 44 C C.)� 3 1,,,ijijllL i .....7- / _ ALTAMO TE SPRING 1 I VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Legend 0 0.5 City Priorities 1 A 1111•1111111111111111 ` } 41 County and State Miles Priorities 1 -8 # City Segment Scority T 1. Rangeline Rd, EE Williamson Rd/Longwood Hills Rd to SR 434 35 �^ # County and State Segment Priority Score m 1. *SR 434, Commerce Park Dr to Springwood Cir 84 --- —1 c 2. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Palmetto Ave to SR 434 83 3. *SR 434, Rangeline Rd to Ronald Reagan Blvd 76 0 4. *SR 434, Ronald Reagan Blvd to US 17-92 76 cz 5. US 17-92, Oak Ln to Dog Track Rd /Seminola Blvd 75 T3 6. *SR 434, Springwood Ct to Rangeline Rd 65 c 7. Ronald Reagan Blvd, SR 434 to Warren St 56 0 m, 8. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Georgia Ave to 14th Ave 38 * indicates part of segment is in the FDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 2024-2048 8 _ OD 2/ E Church Ave r 4 _ 7 a aci-c __ a 0) 0 ri rr I w -a . c 0 ee ...1- L_-- Dog Track Rd 5 CASSELBERRY I Action Plan 173 HIGHER RISK ROADWAYS _ " r, . ._. -13 -: E / , E w N 0 J Longwood Hills Rd i 00 / — Churc hgye ----\, c Warren Ave r I "� LONG \/ I 4�IIIIIIIMMEMMENI -\\ , T-2 --"ill a) >. L _0 U 0 1'' Riski Factor to r__ AL 8 7.95 O O ce 6.07 O b 0 C a) 0) 4 0) 2.65 'a ce 2 — 0.16 0 25 or less 30-35 40-45 50-55 Posted Speed Limit (mph) VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD Legend 0 Speed Limits Road Lanes 0.5 30-35 6 or more lanes A sommwmom 40 45 Miles 1 A -• .—— m c 0 CD 0 0 ce -0 c 0 WINTER 7 SPRINGS E Church Ave 17 JO• d 92 m c o J a cy Higher Risk Roadways 0 Based on Seminole County crash analysis, roadways c \� that were over a posted speed limit of 40 MPH ° were considered high risk. While the highlighted _`g Track Rd roadways may not be on the high injury network, it is recommended these are monitored for improvements as funding is available. i \, , Higher risk roadways in Longwood include: • Lake Emma Road • Dog Track Road Action Plan 175 Recycled plastic roundabout, Annandale, VA QUICK BUILD . ,,, ._ _ i. noKiks.vc. .„..._ ..,., - -K__ . _____\ 1,,,._ . _--r., . . - . -- `,.. , qy v` --- , ..,- HIGHLIGHTS --7,-„, "- StT It; :: \ 1 c,.-:. Quick build infrastructure projects are temporary, low-cost installations that can be constructed in a short -- timefram e, achieve safety goals, ......_ _ and inspire permanent change. ' Quick build installations can be achieved = with materials such as paint, plastic, rubber, L concrete, asphalt, and even foliage! When IV _=•• ' . \ VDOT selecting treatments and materials, consider*: Painted curb extension, Denver, Co �`, ... i-ra dui:.... _, -.mot' • Safety for all users • Ease of installation i` , 4."f ;�U iCIE) t?'- • Traffic calming • Stormwater • Visibility and impacts 014011101114 reflectivity • Durability and • Size duration of • Aesthetics installation • Ease of • Maintenance f.w procurement • Climate y * till fairj ,,,Iiiet • Accessibility • Traffic volume and " s i • • • Cost delay • ��`' K '�-�` • Target speed • Roadway class !' m■ or HDR Rubber raised crosswalk, Minneapolis, MN Countermeasures eligible for quick build projects °,,',- *`tgy;`Aa he`r , - '1 include but are not limited to: .' ' • Lane repurposing • Medians -.= '" • Horizontal • Slow turn wedge - �S deflections • Crosswalks '` _ • Speed tables/ • Roundabouts " .�- cushions • Refuge islands -.l Eft gal _ • Parklets • Buffered bike lanes I "..%...' 1' ,1111111110 • Lane narrowing • Curb extensions ' ' The planning phase of a quick build project _-- f-== _--- �`-- --�` ranges from 2-6 months, with around 1-3 days needed for installation. `� adapted from Tactical Urbanist's Guide to Materials and Design, from The Street Plans Collaborative MnDO pedestrian refuge island, Pi estone, MN = 'g p � Painted .;,-� Rubber speed cushion, Charlotte, NC _ ;< `., .•ti? * " • " i•1.�-s-� 'mil ilhio: M.., ii � � 'r � ,r - . ..4,,..,.. ..- .4141 M1144 ' - - - , -- i r0 - - - . . • •- .0111r - -- - a._lI.:i . . - - r t ' .> V tiig�, MnDOT The a�, gee 1 . - Painted curb return radius reduction, New Hope, MN 4 4' N• Paint and planter buffered bike lane, St. Petersburg, FL . •I - M. :atyTire -w• . . .- _ ,. ..... .1 . t,.- , 1.1.1 ..: ;, II .„_....... ..... ....S ttl�� ligl i , 410. r , MnbC --- 1-TOR- fia i Rubber and plastic buffered bike lane, Denver, CO Plastic traffic separator, Oviedo, FL i4 Yam, I21 r• I.'. _ - I �r r - ' I , -.1t"'is Alliiir 0 4 ...., .� - : '. - , ', ... .. - .� - \ j'i'`. -- -- --- --- HD I? Google Vision Zero Resolution The Vision Zero Resolution was adopted by the Longwood City Commission on XX/XX/XX. The resolution year for Vision Zero is XXXX. PLACEHOLDER NW, , ,,,J , ,•,, ,il• '= M.7.. VISION ZERO CHANGE CENTRAL FLORIDA , Counting down to zero traffic deaths . 01" , .i15-- eit. ...,,,,,h,,, ,,,, , , ,,,\/,, „ .. '-''.'' - - 4 1 4 _ IA c) ® 4 This is Onlythe First Step hp metroplan oda 4141/010 The Action Plan recommends ? improvements to many of the corridors and ALintersections in the City of Longwood. - •As those areas are improved, new needs • ' - will emerge — Vision Zero is iterative by its m • J "� ' nature. , . , The next steps include initiating Year 1 • • Actions and pursuing Federal funding. ._ _ Y r ' .. _ • as•.--f. �J '' .,. ..:-• .. ,, - _ )t, ,k)11001 ,.410,4,„ ,...''-1101:14.4_ •- - . - :, . ...,.. „, 46, ; 91 . .'-'5A*...•-""mtlis. `...1 . ,14.% , ' . .4... • - eir = ' a r ... t.,a��!?�i•� —t + , $ it ` 4 ' 411111 :II . _1 .� - 1 ,. ,. . tir 44 , i •iiii • ,. Il- IA 1,,. ItTi ` l � • r` IT4. .... , .1 �il ;* _ 4 40104 I. k ...jakt.;,„: .. . ; Monitoring Progress is Critical to Evaluating Success These performance measures are recommended for yearly tracking. They will help identify crash trends in real-time instead of waiting another five years. These performance measures help us understand our progress as we embark on zero traffic deaths by the year 20XX. Recommended Performance Measures In the City of Longwood: 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Number of deadly traffic crashes Number of serious injury crashes Number of vulnerable user deadly traffic crashes Number of vulnerable user serious injury traffic crashes Number of deadly or serious injury crashes in USDOT underserved area On City Roads: 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Number of deadly traffic crashes Number of serious injury crashes Number of vulnerable user deadly traffic crashes Number of vulnerable user serious injury traffic crashes Number of deadly or serious injury crashes in USDOT underserved area The City of Longwood is not alone — all Counties and Cities in the MetroPlan Orlando Region are working together to Get to Zero. Together. Vision Zero Resolution I 81 VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 CITY OF LONGWOOD Appendix A. City Road Project Prioritization and Project Sheets B. County and State Road Project Prioritization and Project Sheets Ilk y 1111 / / 'i 1 ,, I /111 ir'w-9---'----)14 4 titr,if.:1 a 1 i is A flti / 1 ' ". 001111 7 7 - _ .,All#:00,707 ' _. ' - .• : j •Ar IMI -1 aie.I s II ....T"-"."-imik.:i-` - ,. i .., .., 1 r .V. 1�� ti ill • I l • ' ii- il i I - liWill I se I - V/OPOSII'ml".11".._ + # lit I' • ", . i t i a .i1C4'.i . r�fti7 . 3 r rti f. ' j . - •• 4* _ i' i I ik a _ a- s .IIl •- I. I n.a 1 11 � ' [ ( r . - VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 C Y OF ONGWOOD Appendix A : City Road Project Prioritization and Project Sheets CITY ROAD PRIORITY PROJECT LIST MOTOR VEHICLE PRIORITY LENGTH DISADVANTAGED DEADLY OR RANK SEGMENT FROM TO (MILES) JURISDICTION CITY SCORE SERIOUS (OUT OF 5) CRASHES EE Williamson Rd/ 1 Rangeline Rd Longwood SR 434 1.05 City Longwood 1 1 Hills Rd VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD 'Note:Probable cost ranges do not account for right-of- way acquisition,drainage improvements,utility impacts, and potential resurfacing needs or project contingencies. A detailed cost estimate should be prepared as part of conceptual plans.Countermeasure costs were sourced from the MetroPlan Orlando Engineering Countermeasure Toolkit. VULNERABLE OPINION OF USER DEADLY CRASH SCORE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBABLE PRIORITY OR SERIOUS PER MILE COST' SCORE CRASHES Safety improvements to increase pedestrian safety and manage speeds.Add $1,49o,000 1 1447 segement lighting,RRFB,appropriate speed limits,raised medians,refuge islands, $2,510,000 35 increased crosswalk density,and a shared-use path. Appendix: City Road Priority Project List I Al 1,05 Miles 1 . Rangeline Rd, EE Williamson Crash Score: 1,447 Jurisdiction: City Rd/Longwood Hills Rd to SR 434 l''"` #y� _ ^. '` , °- 9 Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing - 0.- , , . .� . � Deadly Serious Injury C3R Context Classification .y,,;3'•. arAL �,,N� . _ Pedestrian _ Pedestrian 35 Posted Speed Limit * 0 ► F •� e 0 0 Bicyclist 1 Bicyclist 38 Operating Speed sl', e . ' • " 0 Motorcyclist 0 Motorcyclist Features All-way stop control, , .• :relaikr".. .• .4•'i•.,• { `: 0 Motorist 1 Motorist high-visibility crosswalks, _ 2 Total KSI LED-enhanced stop • _ar e: ,; IL : .• signs, school zone L • .• , ; �`Potential Solutions f "=�~, • _f GCS j!iii -r 7. ' ,, ,,,..4.w...0 ••.. , Irrs. 0 Ire C25 eX • Segment Rectangular Appropriate Raised Refuge Crosswalk .. - } Lighting Rapid and Median Island Density • < '., r ;`' w Flashing Consistent 1 it - '� �('�+� . a. o t.A � Beacon Speed Limits "1a �....i_S �,: fie' ` 9:a-1. , °` . Q CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: 'Deaths shown with icon outlined in black 0 "edestr,ar. s-' Angle sideswipe 0 'on'. rails= © Bicycle L Head Or Q �ollaver q Bus Stops Shared-Use Q motorcycle 111 ,eft Tim ® Off Roaa Path A Motor vehicle O Rear Eric • Other 6 FhWA PROVEN SAFELY COUNTERMEASURE VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 C Y OF ONGWOOD Appendix B : County and State Road Project Prioritization and Project Sheets COUNTY AND STATE ROAD PRIORITY PROJECT LIST VEHICLE PRIORITY LENGTH DISADVANTAGED MOTOR RANK SEGMENT FROM TO JURISDICTION CITY SCORE DEADLLYYR O OR (MILES) (OUT OF 5) SERIOUS CRASHES 1 SR 434 Commerce Springwood 0.47 State Longwood 0 4 Park Dr Cir Ronald 2 Palmetto Ave SR 434 0.38 County Longwood 3 2 Reagan Blvd 3 SR 434 Rangeline Rd Ronald 0.97 State Longwood 3 3 Reagan Blvd 4 SR 434 Ronald US 17/92 1.17 State Longwood 3 4 Reagan Blvd Dog Track 5 US 17/92 Oak Ln Rd/Seminola 1.35 State Longwood 3 6 Blvd 6 SR 434 Springwood Rangeline Rd 1.45 State Longwood 2 1 Ct 7 Ronald SR 434 Warren St 1.10 County Longwood 3 3 Reagan Blvd 8 Ronald Georgia Ave 14th Ave 0.57 County Longwood 1 2 Reagan Blvd VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA 2024 I CITY OF LONGWOOD *Note:Probable cost ranges do not account for right-of- way acquisition,drainage improvements,utility impacts, and potential resurfacing needs or project contingencies. A detailed cost estimate should be prepared as part of conceptual plans.Countermeasure costs were sourced from the MetroPlan Orlando Engineering Countermeasure Toolkit. VULNERABLE OPINION OF USER DEADLY CRASH SCORE PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBABLE OR SERIOUS PER MILE COST' SCORE CRASHES Safety improvements to increase visibility.Add segment and intersection lighting, $1,020,000 1 10468 leading pedestrian interval and pedestrian recall,green conflict striping,and lane $1,260,000 84 narrowing. Safety improvements to increase pedestrian safety.Add refuge islands,increased $760,000- 2 8202 crosswalk density,raised intersections,lane narrowing,and a landscaped buffer. $920,000 83 Safety improvements to increase active transportation safety.Add segment lighting, $590,000- 2 6096 access management,pedestrian hybrid beacons,a bike lane,a landscaped $1,480,000 76 buffer,and green conflict striping Safety improvements to increase visibility and pedestrian safety.Add segment $2,890,000- 5 6876 lighting,RCLT,a raised median,retroreflective signal backplates,pedestrian hybrid $5,790,000 76 beacons,and co-locate bus stops and pedestrian crossings. Safety improvements to increase active transportation visibility and safety.Add 5 7845 access management,extend yellow and all red time,co-locate bus stops and $980,000- 75 pedestrian crossings,a landscaped buffer,a shared-use path,and green conflict $1,380,000 striping. Safety improvements to increase visibility.Add intersection and segment lighting, $980,000- 3 3135 pedestrian hybrid beacons,refuge islands,co-locate bus stops and pedestrian $1,380,000 65 crossings,and green conflict striping. 2 4294 Safety improvements to manage speed and increase visibility.Add retroreflective $530,000- 56 signal backplates,RCLT,speed cameras,and curb return radius reduction. $2,120,000 2 4958 Safety improvements to increase driver awareness and visibility.Add segment $930,000- 38 lighting,rumble strips,high friction surface treatment,and lane narrowing. $1,510,000 Appendix: County and State Road Priority Project List I B1 0.47 Miles 1 . SR 434, Commerce Park Dr to Crash Score: 10,468 Jurisdiction: State • ti r F Springwood Cir s A. Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions ' ; • �p .. 19 DeadlySerious InjuryC3C Context Classification f ;+ • ,-', s • . Pedestrian Pedestrian 35 Posted Speed Limit ' :%4, .. f 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 54 Operating Speed . �,I.,1,, ., 1 - ;4 . ,, ‘- 4 `.�- �/. ,).,'�.=.4 0 Motorcyclist 0 Motorcyclist Features Traffic signals, +.1 •ii . Ti'�f''• "ItdoW ` 4. * • � `' retroreflective signal �I► _. 0 Motorist 4 Motorist �' - f:+ : . - backplates, raised 5 Total KSI medians, high-visibility g?. crosswalks, bike lanes s,.:f/ /_ 0 Potential Solutions /20"er ._ = ,, 001) 1012 . f I ,.. ,,., CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: "Deaths shown with icon outlined in black Segment Intersection Leading Green Lane Q ' ' °nl i "ng�e sideswipe O Death Lighting Lighting Pedestrian Conflict Narrowing 0 Bicycle (y HeadC- eollover p Bus stops Interval, Striping There ore planned Raymond Ave P g Q Motorcycle rest Turn ® otr Roan Projects: & SR 434 A Motor Vehicle © Rear End • Other Operational/Safety improvements on a portion of this segment 0 FHWA PROVEN SAFET.,COUNTERMEASURE 0.38 Miles 2. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Palmetto Crash Score: 8,202 Jurisdiction: County Ave toSR434 it - - i i.f- Awirrier 7� , eaCrash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions • + . a .. ;. / `. ,tln, ._ Deadly Serious Injury C4 Context Classification ` W % :� Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit #' tD 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 50 Operating Speed a r,'- L.. - r'' �I �' _° `--SunRail 0 Motorcyclist 1 Motorcyclist Features Reduced left-turn `"+, ALI - wyy r E Church Ave 0 Motorist 2 Motorist conflict intersection, - ; traffic signal, raised r - ' - ' L 4 Total KSI median , -..., : , F Warren Ave /r '4 • , - - 0� r f w I. '/ E Bay Ave ' i4. % �41 '► fr. Potential Solutions I ► j! ,t- E Prne Ave . . L ` t imit :to. 1„1„1 _ iko ' —. a. Milli nn. _ =• Il , w jr f 0 "t E Sate Road 434 ' , ,tt,rrTt ' C CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: "Deaths shown with icon outlined in black Refuge Increase Raised Lane Landscaped 0 Pedesa:an S Amp, Sideswipe O Death Island at Crosswalk Intersection Narrowing Buffer and 0 Bicycle CO Head On Q Rollover Q Bus Stops Church Ave Density at Church Median 0 Motorcycle i Left Turn © 0.f Rrhia Intersection Ave ii} Motor Vet,er_le O Rear End • Other 0 FrrwA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 0.97 Miles 3. SR 434, Rangeline Rd to Ronald Crash Score: 6,096 Jurisdiction: 7,t,_It Reagan Blvd _ 4 *i _-int . ~ I‘ w e afe Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions :- Deadly itibe iik 01 WO Serious Injury C3C Context Classification c'.*i:-t-'' 4, .•��t . ' ar ' i' '.*'. . -�* . ; ,,.1. Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit • A4.` ,` Ar - 1 .�r-� "s-�' .. ,.. 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 49 Operating Speed "laI -?+r ' A #'.' +•' -`' -�• e 0 Motorcyclist 1 Motorcyclist Features Traffic signals, reduced _ _ , t o Motorist 3 Motorist left-turn conflict 1 l -r _; .. i� . , \,� -1i • intersection, raised '_ �I . k� MIMI 4 ' - IS4"'' `• `eram'' 5 Total KSI median, yield to '� ' pedestrians signage, bike lanes in front of Orlando Health 0 Potential Solutions 0 YAgi ) Or° IMF v 0 CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: "Deaths shown with icon outlined in black Segment Close Pedestrian Bike Lanes Landscaped Green 0 Pedestrian Z Angle - Sideswipe O ,-ath Lighting Driveways Hybrid Along Full Median Conflict 0 Bicycle Head Or O Rollover Q Bug Morn Beacon Segment Striping 0 Motorcycle le :ett turn, ® Ott Roo° Projects: There are planned Complete A Motor Vet,�r-i, © Rear End • Other Streets and pedestrian/bicycle improvements on this segment 6 FHWA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 1.17 Miles 4. SR 434, Ronald Reagan Blvd to Crash Score: 6,876 Jurisdiction: State +L.gligil s �f ^�' 1 . .s, 1 � xa Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions —IA • =.- : •, .�r -� • _r tie. ,i • s /\ Deadly Serious Injury C3C Context Classification -J .J, � . • I. •'-' i r;t et. , ' je;�.i Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit I-K Q - " �''�:i ce _ t ill, ire.► _i, ��° - . •! 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 50 Operating Speed `, I' """�- �' ''-N • i' `'-- .. `� It 0 Motorcyclist 2 Motorcyclist Features Traffic signals, guardrail ''•• '.- / - -. '-' - ` a, ter ` fY , t+r.w! } mik1 Motorist 3 Motorist ' '=` ' : 1.1 , �• i 9 Total KSI .1, ;al CI O �R Q w V Potential Solutions Q ca 0 :IP v • 7 N J "I CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: •Deaths shown with icon outlined in black 0 Padesrr:ac Z Andie Sides+vipe aft Reduced Left- Raised Retroreflective Pedestrian Co-Locate Lighting Turn Conflict Medians Signal Hybrid Bus Stops and° Bicycle ! Head On 0 Rollover Q Bus Stops Intersection Backplates Beacon Pedestrian 0 Motorcycle 1 !eft Tarn ® oft Rena Projects: There are planned Complete Crossings Streets and pedestrian/bicycle iiiii• Malor ven,r.it• ® Rear Eno • other improvements on this segment 0 FItwA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 1.35 Miles 5. US 17/92, Oak Ln to Dog Track Crash Score: 7,845 Jurisdiction: 3tclt_- r Rd/Seminola Blv114116-014;VW �i 0 Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions ';� '7• . .64 . C•ic, ., . ► Deadly Serious Injury C3C Context Classification # 0' ,� •. 9 1 u `.) qe,;, Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit ~' - ,O - . —. r:kt a 0 Bicyclist 1 Bicyclist 54 Operating Speed T.' t. 1 1 Motorcyclist 2 Motorcyclist Features Traffic lights, raised 1.7 ' .+, A medians, reduced left- - •� '" - 1 Motorist 5 Motorist •.xs. - �-�--, .. 11 Total KSI og turn conflict intersection, !►�. s , : „" �"'' p;'` n segment lighting 'R. - y„�rr r h..w , M QC . ."- 4/...?. . -.. Potential Solutions A. t , a -,. r, F,, ,i, 4,„ .- 4,..., _..._ .. ,_ . .., ., *lit 'I" v „f c:mor.6wino- , ' + ' CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: 'Deaths shown with icon outlined in black q.,... Close Extend Yellow Co-Locate Landscaped Shared-Use Green pedestrian ' Angle r sideswipe 0 port Driveways and All-Red Bus Stops and Buffer Path Conflict 0 Bicycle Head On O Rollover Q Bus Stops Time at SR 434 Pedestrian Striping ® Motorcycle a LeH Turn 0 ott Rona & US 17/92 Crossings Atitip Motor Vehicle © Rear End • Other COFHw^PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 1.45 Miles 6. SR 434, Springwood Ct to Crash Score: 3,135 Jurisdiction: State Rangeline Rd el,�� .r 4 �,�.' . • '., �. ; V. ci Crash History (2018 22) Existing Conditions , • ,; ,�� •. .�.. • Deadly Serious Injury C3C Context Classification y ,•• .► "1-. , ,. „ lr••-'' ' .fit. , tea- - _ � , Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit -�' •t*� - v 1 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 54 Operating Speed .$!.. 0 Motorcyclist 0 Motorcyclist Features Traffic signals, raised A �# .�,• '' , f •, • � �'�:�' :� , 0 Motorist 1 Motorist and landscaped �' median, reduced left • `' �'«' 4 Total KSI turn conflict intersection, retroreflective signal backplates �a'�--a4�'s�40 G z Potential Solutions • 3 Q•, re ,,,,, III, 11 . ,... . oo \ „ ' I . . . I CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: •Deaths shown with icon outlined in black © t'edestriar. = Angle Intersection Segment Pedestrian Refuge Co-Locate Green Sideswipe O Deah Lighting Lighting Hybrid Island Bus Stops and Conflict 0 Bicycle GO Head On © Rosover a Bu5Stnps Beacon Pedestrian Striping 0 Motorcycle 1 Lett Turn el Ott Roan Projects: There are planned Complete Crossings 1 iiii Motor Vehcle O Rear End • Other Streets and pedestrian/bicycle improvements on this segment COFIIWA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 1.10 Miles 7. Ronald Reagan Blvd, SR 434 to Crash Score: 4294 Jurisdiction: County Warren St rma-= _ --.4 . "; •0.�_: . cz I . are Crash History (2018 22) Existing Conditions r ' . - 'y ',,,�,;y .� 11 Deadly Serious Injury C3C - a Context Classification •11,„'- r/r > Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit r 21 : 71.'‘ ..'' ,;4J.40:. 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 48 Operating Speed ''-" • t 0 Motorcyclist 2 Motorcyclist Features Segment lighting, traffic --i t , • + .Yw 0 Motorist 3 Motorist signals, raised and ' , . l.A�; ,_,. ' %W. 5 Total KSI landscaped medians, i. .►>�4 '� . high-visibility crosswalks, i -`• '. ,►ii f' -�' school zone i LYMAN I � HIGH ' .. � • s SCHOOL t.,r 1 }. S , • -_-. - r .. _I t ' ' '. Potential Solutions ---, - - t1 s g ) t]. __. __ _ � 6------- r�::L :ram. CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE 'Deaths shown with icon outlined in block © Pedestrian ,a Anyie Retroreflective Reduced Speed Curb-Return Skieswipe O Death Signal Left-Turn Cameras in Radius 0 Bicycle G;1 Head On O Rollover a Bus Stops Backplates Conflict School Zone Reduction 0 Motorcycle a Leh turn ® Ott Road Intersection Motor Vehicle O Rear End • Other 6 FhWA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE 0.57 Miles 8. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Georgia Crash Score: 4,958 Jurisdiction: County Ave to 14th Ave - ,,` - el Crash History (2018 - 22) Existing Conditions - 1 �~ v ,s, {- r ' f' • r� F ■ . .. Deadly Serious Injury C4 Context Classification y 4� J .It Pedestrian Pedestrian 45 Posted Speed Limit • + 0 Bicyclist 0 Bicyclist 50 Operating Speed 0 Motorcyclist 0 Motorcyclist Features Reduced left-turn - e, 0 Motorist 2 Motorist conflict intersection, -4 /` 1, ' * 4 Total KSI traffic signal, raised : i 1" median I i it , r • . . , . ,, 7 .r r .. 41. - * . ts/ Potential Solutions et ,,o, , ' ,l / , . ,D I 3 `f4p ... .IP: IP a w= ..., CRASH MODE: CRASH TYPE: 'Deaths shown with icon outlined in black 0 Pedestrian 3 Angie et Sideswipe Segment Rumble Strips, High Friction Lane O Death Lighting Orange Ave Surface Narrowing 0 Blcvcle Head Or O Rollover Q Bus Mops and Ronald Treatment Reagan Blvd 0 Motorcycle ilk LettTurn ® Ott Road East Leg A Motor Vetucle lO Rear End • Other 0 FHWA PROVEN SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE N1110, VISION ZERO CENTRAL FLORIDA MetroPlan Orlando Project Manager: Lara Bouck- lara.bouck@metroplanorlando.gov City of Longwood Project Manager: Shad Smith - ssmith@longwoodfl.org