CEH-01-23-2025-MINS CODE ENFORCEMENT HEARING
Longwood City Commission Chambers
175 West Warren Avenue
Longwood, Florida
MINUTES
January 23, 2025
9:00 A.M.
Present: Amy Goodblatt, Special Magistrate
Brandon Pownall, City Attorney
Also Present: Shelly Brana, Code Enforcement Officer
Rodney Romeo, Respondent
Oscar Mena, Respondent
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER:
Special Magistrate Amy Goodblatt called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 24, 2024 HEARING:
Special Magistrate Goodblatt approved Minutes from the October 24, 2024
meeting.
3. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE GOODBLATT'S EXPLANATION OF PROCEEDINGS:
Special Magistrate Goodblatt explained the hearing process for the attendees.
4. ROLL CALL OF SCHEDULED CASES:
Special Magistrate Goodblatt did a roll call of the scheduled cases to determine
which Respondents were present.
5. SWEARING IN OF ALL WITNESSES
Special Magistrate Goodblatt swore in all witnesses.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CE23-00075 LDC, Article X Section 10.1.0
CEH 01-23-2025/1
No Permit
ROMEO, RODNEY/FRANCES/REBECCA &
DAVIS, CHRISTINE
621 E. Wildmere Ave.
Longwood FL 32750
Shelly Brana,CEO,City of Longwood Code Enforcement Officer, introduced herself
and presented a cost recovery document to the Special Magistrate and
Respondent(s). The Respondent(s) were present.
A Notice of Violation was issued to the property owner via certified mailing.
Confirmation was received of the Notice of Violation being delivered on May 16,
2023.
A Notice of Hearing was issued and duly served on the property owner via certified
mail on December 13, 2024.
Ms. Brana stated that the property was in violation of LDC, ARTICLE X SECTION
10.1.0 because development activity was completed without a permit.
Development activity was undertaken at the cited property by constructing a boat
ramp and seawall without first obtaining the necessary permit. A Stop Work Order
was issued May 2023. On January 22, 2025 the City was told the permit
application process had been started.
The Respondent Property Owner, Rodney Romeo, testified that originally, they
were just repairing the seawall. Their first contractor told them they didn't need
a permit for the repairs only. They could not find the materials to do the repair,
so they substituted for other costly material. They only added stone to the boat
ramp. 98% of the work was done before the Stop Work Order was issued. It took
over a year to communicate with DEP. He had six to seven months of personal
issues. After receiving the Notice of this Hearing, he reached out to DEP and he
received the necessary DEP letter. He hired a contractor after receiving the Notice
of this hearing. The repairs will take two to three weeks.
The Special Magistrate made inquiries of the Code Enforcement Officer and the
Respondent.
The Special Magistrate found that the Respondent has violated LDC, ARTICLE X
SECTION 10.1.0. Development activity was undertaken at the cited property
without first obtaining the necessary permits. The Development Activity
undertaken was the construction of a boat ramp and sea wall. Compliance
requires that the following be done: Obtain the permits for the sea wall and boat
ramp and pass all required inspections.
CEH 01-23-2025/2
Respondents are to pay administrative costs of $244.86 within 30 days after
service of the Orders. If the Respondents do not comply within six weeks from the
date of service of the Orders by obtaining the required permits and by passing all
required inspections within 30 days thereafter, the Respondents shall pay a fine
of $50 per day for each day the violation continues to exist beyond the date set
for compliance.
B. CE24-00381 LDC, Article X Section 10.1.0
No Permit
MILLER, DAVID
1402 Cardinal St.
Longwood FL 32750
Case Withdrawn
C. CE24-00382 LDC, ARTICLE X SECTION 10.1.0
No Permit
MENA, OSCAR
714 West Ct.
Longwood FL 32750
Shelly Brana, CEO, City of Longwood Code Enforcement Officer, introduced herself
and presented a cost recovery document and photographs to the Special
Magistrate and Respondent(s). The Respondent(s) were present.
A Notice of Violation was issued to the property owner via certified mailing.
Confirmation was received of the Notice of Violation being delivered on October
23, 2024.
A Notice of Hearing was issued and duly served on the property owner via certified
mail on December 7, 2024.
Ms. Brana stated that the property was in violation of LDC, ARTICLE X SECTION
10.1.0. The cited residential property was converted from a 3-bedroom 2
bathroom dwelling to a 6-bedroom 3-bathroom property. One of the
bedrooms/bathrooms was created by closing in the garage door. No permits were
obtained to do this development activity. The initial report was made by a Tenant
of the property. The owner tried to obtain a permit without a contractor. The
permit was rejected because the owner may not obtain an owner permit if he does
not reside there. A contractor applied for a permit, but numerous deficiencies
existed which were never corrected, and the permit was not issued.
CEH 01-23-2025/3
The Respondent Property Owner, Oscar Mena via his son as his interpreter, gave
the following testimony: He is learning about the process to obtain permits. He
lives at this property and he allows friends and family to live there. The house had
2-bathrooms. He altered the house. He asked for 60 days to re-submit the permit.
He testified he understood all that the Magistrate ordered and explained.
The Special Magistrate made inquiries of the Code Enforcement Officer and the
Respondent.
The Special Magistrate found that the Respondent has violated LDC, ARTICLE X
SECTON 10.1.0 because development activity took place at the cited residence
without first obtaining the necessary permits. The development activity was re-
configuring a house by adding bedrooms and bathrooms without a permit.
Compliance requires the following to be done: Hire a licensed contractor. Obtain
signed and sealed plans to be approved by the City. Submit a permit application
and complete all work, including any required inspections or return the property
to its original condition.
Respondents are to pay administrative costs of$125. This cost is to be paid within
30 days of service of the Final Orders. If the Respondent does not comply within
30 days from the date of service of the Final Orders by submitting signed/sealed
plans, obtaining the necessary permits and by completing all work and by passing
all required inspections within 45 days thereafter,the Respondent shall pay a fine
of$50 per day for each day the violation continues to exist beyond the date set
for compliance.
7. REPORTS-CASE UPDATES. None.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS. None.
9. OLD BUSINESS. None.
10. NEW BUSINESS. None.
11. ADJOURNMENT
Special Magistrate Goodblatt adjourned the meeting at 9:45 a.m.
Amy Goodblatt, Special Magistrate Shelly C. Br , Co e Compliance Officer
CEH 01-23-2025/4